Monday, June 03, 2013
|
 |
43rd CTP (PAS)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Deputy Commissioner Hunza Nagar
Posts: 1,090
Thanks: 195
Thanked 1,551 Times in 674 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheUniter
I could not replace IR due to shortage of time but i was confident over IR paper; i had prepared it very well and paper also went excellent. but i cant understand what went wrong with the checker!! what does he want from candidates to write in the paper!! it is not only me who is victim of this gross injustice but there are many including position holders; you can look at DMC of aijaz ali zardari, he is at merit no 69 but fail in IR!! what is this?? someone who can secure a good position cannot write well in IR paper??? it is the policy of the fpsc which destroys carrers of many candidates!!
|
You are right, but i think it was not the policy of FPSC rather all the damage was done by the examiner, see FPSC would not bother to destroy a subject that is of 100 marks and opted by a small number of people.....if at all they had to do something like that, they would have done with Psychology, everyone has opted it and everyone has 150-165 marks in it.....
I my self was very confident to cross 70 marks in IR as my paper was a real gem (i think so) , but i could hardly pass it securing 33 marks, so i think examiner was having some issue while checking the paper.....
__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option.
|