View Single Post
  #237  
Old Monday, July 15, 2013
AFRMS AFRMS is offline
37th Common
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,514
Thanks: 1,053
Thanked 1,681 Times in 873 Posts
AFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud of
Default CSS: some issues

CSS: some issues


CSS is the competitive examination administered for induction into different posts of civil service of Pakistan.

It was always considered a forum based on merit and fair play. But not anymore.

The Faisalabad incident, which recently came to light, seriously questions its credibility and integrity. Candidates from Faisalabad were caught changing their answer-sheets in connivance with postal officials.

It is frustrating for young candidates who believed in their competence and had worked hard. No one knows for how long this malpractice had been going on. Nor is anyone aware of the magnitude of damage done to the system. The main accused is still at large.

Had there been no delay in receiving the bundles of answer-sheets in FPSC HQ, this incident would not have come to light.

It was revealing to know that the answer-sheets are transported through post offices.

On top of it, the FPSC has scattered the CSS centres all over the country bringing it to the level of district, which otherwise may not be easy to manage in a proper way.

People also report that there is now frequent mobile usage going on in examination halls.

The credibility of CSS as a competitive examination has already been eroded by the introduction of different quotas.

Initially, there was a provincial quota which was probably justified in order to give representation to backward areas.

Instead of doing away with this quota in due course, additional quotas over a period have been introduced.

Now there is a quota for armed forces, women and minority. This negates the spirit of competitiveness. It is now an examination of quotas.

Would someone look into the issues mentioned above to save a system (which otherwise was seen as fool-proof and without any serious flaws)?

IMTIAZ AWAN Islamabad

DAWN
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AFRMS For This Useful Post:
Abrar Javed (Monday, August 12, 2013), Fahad M Mirza (Monday, July 15, 2013), redmax (Tuesday, July 16, 2013)