Quote:
Originally Posted by urazakhan
i think the third name was younger than james.......because jack was the youngest and on first position........james was in rear......rear means behind obviously...........so he should had been on the 2nd position.........but the 4th name(suppose it was jane) was on the 2nd position both in age and height(it was mentioned in the question)..........so james would be on 4th position......and third would be(i think it was jin) younger than james.......................God knows rest...........
|
i marked jim i guess.
In those figures which was odd one?