View Single Post
  #67  
Old Saturday, August 24, 2013
silverfox silverfox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 40
Thanks: 25
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
silverfox is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anwaartheravian View Post
@Psycho Empire: I don't think this happened due to any of these 2 reasons. Even if you see the case of OMG in Punjab, the last male allocated is on 147th position, whereas women were allocated upto merit number 159 on general seats (and upto merit number 180 on women reserve seats). Their are around 10 male candidates between 147th and 159th position who remain unallocated, while ladies got their way. I don't think these 10 candidates haven't written OMG in their preference list, or all of them have been victim of suitability clause.

Can someone explain what could be the possible reason behind this.
Women allocation after 147 is according to their qota... (now what confuses most of us is why some women get general seats why not women qota seats...here comes the sutibility clause- the one after 147 cannot be allocate in DMG)

make it simple
punjab women qota= 12 seats
punjab merit closed @ 147
punjab women allocated after merit closed= 12
Reply With Quote