Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sureshlasi
It`s is unlawful to publish other`s material on their own appellation but their copy-rights on cheap price may accomodate Poors to read the worthy material on cheap prices. For Instance, Windows Original Copy worths atleast 50 $ ; By this aspect, Most of our nation couldn`t acquire Computer facilities till yet.
The Original Copy of Oxford dictionary costs more than 1500 ruppees, So who would handle it in our region. It may advocate Bulls for securing their lucre. I think, It should be tolerable to Copy-right but No change should be occurred in their appellation.
|
Well, a very good example but in my opinion that's not PLAGIARISM in fact. It'll be PLAGIARISM when I'll sell or market WINDOWS or the OXFORD dictionary (at cheap or higher prices)
claiming to be my own creation. Here copying someone's work to provide assistance to others is not unlawful but claiming the work to be your's.
Encyclopedia defines PLAGIARISM as
"a practice of falsely claiming, or implying, original authorship or of incorporating material from someone else's written or creative work, in whole or in part, into one's own without adequate acknowledgment."