View Single Post
  #246  
Old Wednesday, November 13, 2013
AFRMS AFRMS is offline
37th Common
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,514
Thanks: 1,053
Thanked 1,681 Times in 873 Posts
AFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud ofAFRMS has much to be proud of
Default CSS exams: competitiveness

CSS exams: competitiveness


THIS is apropos of the letter ‘CSS exams: plea to CJP (Oct 29). The writer is demanding BS-17 positions in federal government for the 550 unallocated candidates of CSS examinations in 2012.

I disagree with the writer. There are hundreds of candidates who have passed the CSS examinations in previous years but were not allocated any group.

If the plea is accepted by the chief justice, then the first ones to get the job should be those hundreds of aspirants.

The CSS is the only examination in the country where meritocracy and transparency has been upheld for decades. Every candidate gets three chances to prove his or her standing in this prestigious competitive examination.

We should not compromise on the examination’s quality of competitiveness, and make every effort to strengthen this institute rather than making it spineless.

I believe such pleas would hurt the feelings of previous candidates who were not allocated any group, and may also affect the competitiveness of CSS examinations.

WAQAR ALI BHUTTO Larkana

Dawn
Reply With Quote