Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarrial Banda
Those who think re-exam is agaist rules, please open your eyes. These rules are for candidates i.e. candidates can not demand a re-exam like in case a candidate fell ill & is unable to appear or incase some mishap happens with a candidate during exam & he is unable to complete his paper etc. So according to this rule, such a candidate can't demand a re-exam on medical or any other grounds whatsoever.
|
Dear your comments match your username. They are very "sarrial". Which dictum states that this rule is only for candidates who demand a re-exam on medical or any other ground? which court has interpreted this provision the way you have elaborated?
The rule only says that " there shall be no re-exam under any circumstances". Period. Any lawyer worth his salt would easily use this rule against FPSC. When teh rules clearly stipulate that there shall be no exam come what may howcome FPSC can take a re-exam of certain candidates.
In future, please don't delve into the domain of others. You dont know jack about the law. Please avoid enlightening us with your ' legal interpretations'. Thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asadjamil1
dear i am fail in only Muslim law passing marks in this optional subject will take the aggregate to 660, plz guide me what should i do?
|
I would request you to join the petition by becoming a co-petitioner. That is the only avenue.