Thursday, November 28, 2013
|
|
43rd CTP (PAS)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Deputy Commissioner Hunza Nagar
Posts: 1,090
Thanks: 195
Thanked 1,551 Times in 674 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bear
the below image is what you said had problems on line 5 and 7 . although they are good and sound as per the laws of algebra .
now lets examine what you have asked to analyse .
according to you AND-ing ( conjunction) should be done in the end and first we need to perform the OR ( disjunction )
lets have a look at the table for A and ( B or C )
just look at the line 2 , here FPSC violated the rule ( although i used the expression just like you asked me to use)
in short the 2012 rules were almost same as those in 2013 but candidates in 2012 were dealt according to the old rules of 2001 - 2002 - 2003 . the flawed rule of 2012 could allow the candidates , failed in aggregate but pass in both compulsory and optional , to appear in interview . but this never happened because people never bothered to interpret rules .
now in 2013 fpsc suddenly woke up, changed the flawed rule and replaced it with an even tougher one .they also implemented it this time which shocked the candidates .
|
Yes now it is correct, now you have written the truth value of conjunction in row 5 and 7 as False because truth value of A is False and a conjunction has truth value as True when truth vale of all its components is True. Good you got the point.
And yes for the disjunctive statement to be True when at least one of disjuncts' Truth value is true, row 2 is valid.
__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option.
|