Thread: Omission of "that" as subordinate conjunction
View Single Post
  #4  
Old Tuesday, December 06, 2005
sibgakhan sibgakhan is offline
SIBGA-TUL-JANAT
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Appreciation
  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,221
Thanks: 349
Thanked 428 Times in 261 Posts
sibgakhan is a jewel in the roughsibgakhan is a jewel in the roughsibgakhan is a jewel in the roughsibgakhan is a jewel in the rough
Default
I checked the first sentences of both C and D and assert that the "that" CAN NOT be removed. It's indispensable.

HOW????
Reply With Quote