There is too much (empty) rhetoric here so I'd try to break it up into parts to make it a bit coherent.
Quote:
|
USA and other Nato member were also of the same view 12 years ago and they put in place whatever financial physical technalogical resources they have to eradicate that style. However, After 12 years of war they have realized that they can not impose their misleading and corrupt system in this country.
|
1. No one here is supporting what USA/NATO did.
2. So if an invader fails to "eradicate" a certain life-style, that life-style is deemed the right one? There are dozens of examples where this happened with non-Islamic life-styles, does this automatically prove them right? I'll pick a simple example: US invasion of Vietnam was a terrible failure. Does this make the Vietnamese life-style the one true life-style? That standard is a very slippery slope.
Quote:
|
one more thingh do not use the kind of terms that general public does not understand. Your irrelevant type of knoweldge does not help you winning any kind of argument.
|
In proverbial language, this is called 'ignorance is bliss', that is, don't tell people what is true because it makes them very uncomfortable. Unfortunately, the world does not care whether you have knowledge or not.
Quote:
|
Whatever other person presents you term it irrelevant and whatever you present is only relevent!
|
Of course, if someone goes off the topic, I will point that out. You are free to point out my irrelevance.
Quote:
|
Seculars are hypocrites that killed our 10 million people in two world wars and then reached at the conclusion that religion is the base of all this haterd.
|
This is priceless.
1. Secularists did not incite/fight the two world wars. Misguided/extreme nationalism was the main reason.
2. No one, at the end of the war or thereof, "reached at the conclusion" that religion is evil or any such sort of thing. Making things up might be perfectly valid you but that does won't work.
Quote:
|
look at negative growth rate in eurpoe in Japan. The USA society is also built on looted resources of Saudi Arabi, Middle East.
|
More sweeping statements, called "hawai fire" in Urdu. Europe and America certainly built their economies on the wealth they looted from the third world during and after colonization but that has little, or nothing, to do with religion. South America is the most severely affected region because of American policies and guess what? It does not have a single Muslim country.
Quote:
|
The initial argument started was that whether islam is a deen or religion . You were even ignorant of this simple fact.
|
I take it whoever disagrees with your concept/interpretation of "deen" is ignorant? I see.
Quote:
|
Then you started condemning religions and system that Islam provides to mankind
|
No I didn't. Condemning Islam and criticizing the medieval interpretations that are unable to work in today's world are two different things.
Quote:
|
I am of the view that Taliban just had established the system to a greater degree.
|
That's not called establishing a system. That's called barbarism. And I told you the kind of things they did, which you dismissed as a propaganda by Western media. I don't think any argument can work on someone who rejects all criticism calling it propaganda/conspiracy.
Quote:
|
Why Wars are going on in most Islamic countries?
|
Because of the sectarian divides and political Islam, chiefly that. And the strife and wars go back to medieval times. There's nothing new about it. America wasn't around before a couple of centuries ago but Muslims were cutting each others throats much before that.
Quote:
|
Who is usurping resources of others and who is imposing its system?
|
America is certainly doing that but here's another culprit: Saudia Arabia. Both are the biggest finances of terrorism around the world. Either you should criticize both or neither.
Quote:
|
Are we imposing our system on west or west is invading us to impose his system here. The so called liberals could not digest the legitimate government of Muhammad Mursi in Egypt .
|
I'll update you on this issue. The USA stopped its military aid after this happened but Saudi Arabia increased its aid and wholeheartedly supported this action of Muhammad Mursi. Oh and Saudia is also angry why the US hasn't invaded Syria to kill more Muslims. I wonder where does "all Muslims are brothers" attitude goes when it comes to Saudi Arabia. Just keep criticizing the "West", which is actually the reason why you are using this internet, to name one little thing.
Quote:
|
yes its true that secularism is prevailing right now but it will never be the same case.
|
Clearly you have no idea what secularism is.