Quote:
Originally Posted by Caas
Did you actually write this in the exam?
I don't remember my outline but I reflected on how the theme of a multiplicity of narratives of which the post modernism is the vanguard goes against the West which is a hegemon in terms of political beliefs, economic systems etc. I made out a few points for e.g. that capitalism is not the only economic system that is suited to democracy and in this regard challenges to the West come from the West itself- Scandinavian countries employ a socialist democracy quite successfully. Similarly the Western notion that individual well being is mirrored through the GDP has been questioned by academics like the Nobel prize winner Amartya Sen who proposes a capabilities approach i.e. what a person is capable of doing determines how well off he/she is. Western individualism vs Eastern collectivist spirit and so on...
Have I digressed from the topic?
|
No, I planned to and made an initial outline but did not attempt it.
The topic of the essay dealt with ethics, what is wrong and right, and particularly about postmodern ethics which has fuzzed the traditional as well as modern distinction between right and wrong. How has this new set of fuzzy ethics become a challenge to the West where it has originated?
You can decide yourself.