@ futurestar
dear i do not know the criteria regarding distribution of marks. But the process was no doughtedly impartial. Final 11 candidates lie in top 15 in the pre-interview list. That means interview had very less percentage in marks distribution.[/QUOTE]

Process is dubious my dear.....as if they had to select the candidates from top20., then why they called the other 55 and wasted their time ??????????? The question is that when they set a criteria of calling the candidates with 67 or more marks in interview, then why they selected only from top 20??? The confusing thing is that no one from other 55 who interviewed on 2nd (16 july), 3rd (17 july) and 4th (18 july) was capable enough to be selected?? The process is totally biased man....