Seniors please check, and comment following comprehensive note:

"Let us agree to disagree in an agree-able way" (CSS 2013)


It is true that one should, if reasonable, disagree in agree-able manner. For, disagreeing is very natural and is part of human nature. God has given humans diverse thinkings, for that all, humans can not have same thinking. But when disagreeing they should do it in agreeable manner i.e. in pacific manner.

Disagreeing in agree-able manner has manifold advantages. If two or more groups are disagreeing in agree-able manner they are less likely to violate each other's rights and possessions thus making less harm to themselves and surroundings.

Moreover, agree-able manner could also lead the problem on the path of solution. Problems mainly erupt because of egoism and it is generally accepted that pacificism is the solution of all sorts of egoism. For that, disagreeing groups will slowly and gradually be agreed.
"The test of man is when he is in quarrel" - Bernard Shaw
Further, as Shaw rightly says quarrel (disagreeing) shows real personality of any person. Disagreeing in agreeable manner implies well-mannered personality whereas disagreeing in unruly manner implies immature and ignorant personality. Therefore, disagreeing should be in agree-able, pacific and non-extremist way.

Conclusively, keeping the statement in view and analysing it critically, it is established that "Yes, Everyone should agree to disagree on agree-able terms"