View Single Post
  #29  
Old Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Almas khan Almas khan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 106
Thanks: 22
Thanked 78 Times in 40 Posts
Almas khan is on a distinguished road
Default

I would second the opinion of revising the law. Irony is people are afraid of talking about this issue, in fear of being called "offender" towards Islamic Ideology. on a serious note our Council of Islamic Ideology is very much concerned about "Marriage" issues and trying to advocate polygamy for almost a decade.
Islam is peaceful religion, the only thing not tolerated under Islam is "zero/no-tolerance" towards anything.
Even under the Sharia law there are 4 options to deal with blasphemy case, one being exile from the place, cut off hand or foot and last (if blasphemy is carried out intentionally and proved to harbinger hater and fomenting resentment) sentence to death.
It is even a form of extremism that we do not tolerate any other religion and the most dangerous form is "taking law in your hands".
Our current blasphemy law states that burden of proof lie on accused, and the one who put allegations is free of any duty like proving his claim, under this situation many people can take advantage of such liberty and can cause great harm to the people out of their personal grudges.
__________________
Women who seek to be equal to men lack ambition. :)
Reply With Quote