A-General Points:
1-Screening test was out of the box, irrelavent to the syllabus.

2-Islamiat was not included, whereas in our first admission letter, it was given then why it was not included in the later test, without Islamiat, any exam, test is unethical, immoral, and unconstitutional, does it mean they are going to hire all non-muslims?

3-Question paper was out prior to test date, Plus, why mobiles allowed and many invigilators were involved in this practice to support their favourite candidates.

B-Main Points:

1-More than 16 invalid and wrong questions including invalid answers too!

2-Errors in keys

3-Confession of SPSC on the very second day and blunders done by spsc shows immaturity incompetency of chairman, spsc and paper setter

4-Incompetency of chairman because of his signing and approving wrong and invalid question paper of a very important exam

The above four points are more than enough to held responsible guilty for them.

What should be our goals?

1-Demand of minimum 12 to 10 grace marks and everyone should get equal right to appear in the exam

2-Or passing marks should be 40 because of invalid and out of syllabus, because, in CSS exam 40% is passing marks then why injustice in this exam with the addition of invalid, wrong question paper and wrong keys!

3-Chairman should resign immediately, because he is no more able to solve the problems (It is additional, if you don't agree with this point it is alright)

4-Hence, our main focus should be to make it 40 passing marks and correction of keys.

5-Last but not the least, if SPSC does not agree with the above points, then there should be rescreening with reasonable syllabus



Waiting for other freinds, I am always available at your disposal, we have to fight for right!