1. As far as marks are concerned, the passing criteria depends on the people who score good. At 69 marks, sindh rural has almost 5 people for one seat. If they reduce 1 mark only, the ratio will increase to 7 per seat. Thus 60 will make 20 to 50 people for 1 seat. Thus they select only a limited number of people for 1 seat which can never be criticised.
2. Nabs last test passing marks were 65 for sindh rural.
3. Passing marks are dependant on the number of seats in each region. E.g 10 seats in sindh rural, they cant select more than 50 candidates for next phase. Thus the top 50 candidates get selected.
The same thing happens in other organizations like i.b where passing marks are above 92(last teat, yet never criticised)
4. As far as facilities are concerned, its right they are below par as they ought to be. But yet, comparing to spsc or fpsc, hardly any differnce can be found.
5. 1 good thing about nts is that they are not as corrupted as spsc, n much faster than fpsc.
6. Fees structure of other tests is same as others. What do u pay for any other job in spsc or fpsc? 17th scales job costs abt 600, css costs 2200, 16th scale costs 300.