Fpsc is credible in term of reputation, but in Pakistan there is always opulent like respected Dr. Arslan Iftikhar, which finds back-door entry in bureaucratic setup. I don't think chairman or any single individual can be shield against nepotism or corruption.Furthermore, for the chairmanship of fpsc they should consider a bureaucrat not army personals, I think chairman should be the one who passes the same system like any ordinary csp. Whereas, these army personals enter into bureaucracy through Zia's paved way.
Last edited by lovereflector; Tuesday, September 01, 2015 at 12:12 AM.
Reason: addition
|