On an honest note, I do not believe in impartial checking of this very exam. The reason lies in the following marks:

Essay: 17 (Wrote on digital technologies with more or less 12 pages. I was hopeful of passing this subject. If I accept such worse marks, then.....)
Composition: 61 (What about this one? If I could be good at this subject, what made me fail in essay? Did the checker get tired of checking too many papers?)

In public administration, I was expecting not more than 55 marks. This was the paper I feared the most. They gave me 74, highest among optionals, how? I was expecting more than 120 marks in psychology, but they gave me only 92? My conscience is not allowing me to accept such a weird result.

Total marks: 612

Eventually, I'm compelled to acknowledge my failure.