View Single Post
  #5  
Old Friday, December 04, 2015
Ambivalent Ambivalent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 125
Thanks: 18
Thanked 60 Times in 47 Posts
Ambivalent is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sociologist PU View Post
FATA should have been included in the NWFP (now KPK) immediatly after the creation of Pakistan. If that would have been done, there would have no problem of Taliban and extremism now. FATA was the need of British Indian government, not the need of Pakistan.
Since independence, Pakistan has retained many governmental, bureaucratic, and constitution rules of the British; one such rule is the use of FCR in FATA. FATA, being an essential part of our country, is suffering under this rule after independence. The rights of the people are not granted and they differ and are minimal from the rights of the rest of the country. They don't have their say of their own in the form of provincial assembly. The federal representation from FATA cannot make laws for FATA, making their presence as bogus parliamentarians. It is the president and governor who, kind of, rules on FATA. Thus, to make them out of misery, reforms talks should never be sabotaged on political basis. It is actually politics that refrain them from becoming a province. Merging them with KPK would be good, giving them their own province would be much better. But this has to be solved. Adding another point, Gilgit Baltistan is not a province and it has not been given a constitutional status, so comparing FATA on that model would be unfair. It would also be good to make GB also a complete and full-fledged province.
Both FATA and GB hold great strategic importance for our nation. Developing them would mean that our strategic efficiency would also improve with them.
__________________
Best of Luck.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ambivalent For This Useful Post:
adan zahra (Saturday, December 05, 2015)