Ah, that explains it. A guy recently wanted to know who the person was who 'predicted' the precise date of the results for a test, but the predictor's post was deleted; it wasn't a prediction but was concrete news.

However, I can understand the decision - too often people just make up predictions on their own to get some 'gup' going.

In my opinion, the current rule in place regarding deleting prediction posts is a just one, however, if a person mentions his source openly (name + designation or screenshot of a mail), the post should be left as is. Just a humble suggestion.

__________________
D: