[QUOTE=kingfalcon;909995]1. You follow Hudood Laws as you wish, nobody is stopping you but you cannot force anything on others. anyone who enters the folding of Islam must have to accept it, if not, you have the option to adopt another religion. Following two ideologies leads you nowhere.
2. Pakistan was supposed to be much more secular democratic and liberal than India, that is why Objectives Resolution was a deviation. Your first law minister was a Hindu (Jogendra Nath Mandal) approved by Jinnah. Jinnah made it clear in 11-Aug speech that the nature of state will be secular. Was Jinnah a Molvi type person? I don't think so. Besides, Jinnah agreed with Cabinet Mission Plan (Autonomy inside the Indian Union), Congress did not and that is where partition was chosen by Jinnah
. jinnah essentially was not a molvi but he led a deeply conservative society a highly stratified one that can only be united around Islamic ideology. Believe me there would have been four more states in south Asia had the Islamic ideology been scrapped out
3. Holocaust was a very bad event in the history of mankind. If a similar thing happened to Muslims in a European country, wouldn't you be hurt if some people denied it or supported it? Healthy criticism and discussion on Holocaust is not forbidden in Europe.
yeah holocaust is as painful to westerners as the sanctity of prophet to Muslims. If Europe is so enlightened then why they hurt again and again the Muslims' sentiments
4. You are right that secularism is the outcome of European's efforts to combat the evils of their own society, those evils were the religious extremism and rule of clergy that we are facing today. The only difference is that they learnt it 500 years ago and we are going through it now
you should also at the external affairs of secular states please. Has their ideology stopped them from human rights violation, exploitation of global south, state interventions and above all racism and leftist bigotry?
__________________
winners never quit, and quitters never win.
|