There must have been an error in writing pages( 2-10) because 240 candidates for interview against 61 seats is an appropriate number considering 4-5 candidates against one seat. If there are 10 pages then the number of candidates for interview would be around 900. Thats not possible for 61 seats. By the way they should have compiled separate results for three phases by dividing seats among these phases. The paper of third phases was way too easy as compared with other two phases.