Tuesday, February 16, 2016
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 175
Thanks: 285
Thanked 108 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpedior
But highlighting the issue under discussion to NAB will be benefitial in either way, as we understand that sufficient circumsational evidence is available to believe that the result is not 100% merit based.
Second point is crying foul once it is announced will have very little attention.
At present, copies are available, paper checkers are alive, spsc bureaucracy is sitting in offices, so everything can be checked and cross verified. This may ensure some transparency if NAB investigates it.
I am proceeding with the idea. Lets see.
Regards
|
best of luck but its not possible. even chairman nab cannot authorize investigation into the issue at this stage
|