View Single Post
  #151  
Old Friday, February 26, 2016
Toru Toru is offline
46th CTP (PAAS)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2017 - Merit 230
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 250
Thanks: 27
Thanked 92 Times in 69 Posts
Toru is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gintino View Post
No one is saying that the examiner is going to penalize you for assuming John to be the writer's friend, or, for that matter, taking George to be a local or a shopkeeper or a vendor or an inhabitant. These are non-essentials. He is not going to care about it.

Broadly speaking, here are four things that he is going to look for (in decreasing order of their significance):

1) Clarity and organization
2) No "Jerkiness" and continuity and flow
3) Omission of illustrations and examples
4) Use of third person
5) Adhering to word limit


And I agree, if he is going to target the preci paper, he's going to do mindless and senseless checking. And it will depend on his whims. But these 5 pointers are generally the stuff that a CSS examiner is looking for.
It is disappointing to see that you have been distracted by the use of my illustration than the point I was trying to make. As far as as your comment is concerned:

Firstly, you should be mindful of the fact that you, or any of us, are no authority over what the examiner cares about. That is a purely exclusive domain. So you needn't even mention it.

Secondly, the reason why people fail precis/essay is in the very fact of clarity -- which again is subjective. Candidates obviously make an attempt to be as clear and logical as possible, but it so happens that they aren't (by the examiner's standards), thereby resulting in failure.

Thirdly, there is no science for a precis which puts marks or weightage -- that too by way of importance, on the five points mentioned. From an examination perspective, particularly css, clarity is highly subjective -- though on the face of it seems unlikely. When I say subjective, I mean the examiner's views regarding the attempt. And I can refute your argument by asserting that there is ''equal value'' for the points, thereby contributing a fifth of the total mark.

Lastly, adherence to word limit is a ''scientific rule'' for a precis. There is no subjectivity in this fact whatsoever. Let me also clarify what science means lest you don't understand/misunderstand: It is a universal truth; with universal application. So you shouldn't have even bothered putting that on the list you want to believe holds weight.
Reply With Quote