View Single Post
  #920  
Old Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Peacepeacepeace Peacepeacepeace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 87
Thanks: 19
Thanked 37 Times in 29 Posts
Peacepeacepeace is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bab Baloch View Post
First of all the matter is lying in court of law so its against the law to criticize / judge whether its according to law or against till the judgement come. Second, there are many grievances of Sr. Office Associates , one of them is that they are serving in BPS-15 and next liable promotion was in 18 grade. However they are now asked to accept promotion in 16 grade instead of 18. Third Sindh government is upgrading BPS-15 into 16 notification is expected before budget, it means they are already in 16 grade and no further promotion for the till retirement !! In last, according to them as per HC administrative rules amendment is necessary before creating any new designation and in this case law is violated. Now who is right and who is wrong the ball is now in court. As for as new appointment are concerned , I don't think this case has any affection.
How honerable chief justice & four senior justice of SHC dare to violate law! Are they unware & uneducated?
They are senior associates(bps15) how they become junior court associates. I think it will be injustice for them to replace title of SENIOR with title of JUNIORS mere difference of one grade!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Peacepeacepeace For This Useful Post:
pureapak (Tuesday, May 24, 2016)