Quote:
Originally Posted by pcswarrior
I replied 80% of the questions. Medium is both English and Urdu. They asked analytical questions in English and Short one's in urdu. They asked about CSS attempts I replied Sir I left with 2 marks in Islamiyat in my first and final attempt. they replied why final, why not you appeared before. I replied, sir unfortunately in my family and community circle there is not a tradition to apply in government services so it takes a lot of years to make my mind for competetive exams. They all passed a smile on my answer. One more thing they asked why we hire you: I replied sir simply because I have diversified background and experience for the post and second this is my final chance for any competetive position so one thing is for sure that I can't leave you for any better position.
|
Well I cant understand one thing. Y interview pattern was not uniform. Some people were engaged in discussions, other like me, were bombarded with token questions and 90% of them were only about dates and names.
Moreover, Panels obsession with serving CSPs was also evident from fact that they involved them in discussion, ideas and opinions, whereas others were put dealt by asking dates and names and even treated harshly.
To me, criteria has prevailed over merit. Eligibility was given preference over suitibility. But any how SPSC has performed much higher than expectations of aspirants in these corrupt times.
Regards