Quote:
Originally Posted by Adnan AKRAM
Don't waste your time in unfruitful pursuits. Sit in would not change the FPSC long standing policy. Rather focus your shortcomings and loopholes. Everyone knows FPSC target one or two subjects every year. There is nothing new or strange in it. It doesn't mean that they fail students deliberately in those papers but they select the best 200-300 papers in a specific subject. And its very important to shortlist 20000 students to maintain efficiency of the system. Every body hold some reservations but its better for you to adapt yourself to this policy rather waste your time to make FPSC realize the curse of this policy. A very simple remedy for you, try to be among top 200 in every paper. You will not complain like this in future. Writing articles in JW times is great but you can not claim automatic favor just for writing article in an average or below average level magzine. FPSC recommended JWT magazine only for current affairs and not for essay writing or precis. If you have any attempt left work hard for it and if it was your last attempt then CSS is not the end of world. Cheers  |
Well, I dont want to argue with you however, I ll just say FPSC has no proper paper checking criteria and under article 19-A we have right to information regarding such pathetic paper checking policy by FPSC. Saying work hard or covering loopholes sound easy for you but what if you produce best material in paper and it later turns out to be a nightmare for you? Even Cambridge examination branch has proper mechanism for paper checking as well as marking and grading but FPSC is living in dark ages.
In conclusion, FPSC must devise proper policy in order to overcome its flaw rules particularly in paper checking or else it raise many questions over its credibility.
Please check this site.
http://www.cie.org.uk/cambridge-for/...g-and-grading/