Is this RIGHT?!?!?!?!

[aqib]

Hello Everyone!

Its a perception that candidates who differ and contradict with the ideas and policies of the govt. and the general prevailing system of bureaucracy are not much encouraged and are quite unlikely to get a chance to become a CSP Officers even if the ones are brilliant in all aspects.
Firstly if they expresse their contradictory and opposing opinions in the written papers, then they are not much likely to get through, and even if they manage to get through the written part, they are tested in the interview and given a chance to surrender their maverick ideas and views, and to become a part of a system, and if they still decline or fail to do so, they are out.
The Moral of the story is they need "Slaves not the Masters".

[prieti]

Originally Posted by aqib

Hello Everyone!

Its a perception that candidates who differ and contradict with the ideas and policies of the govt. and the general prevailing system of bureaucracy are not much encouraged and are quite unlikely to get a chance to become a CSP Officers even if the ones are brilliant in all aspects.

Is this RIGHT?!?!?!?!

As far as I hav heard from my mentors, this perception is TRUE...Css aspirants are always advised to abstain from giving anti-government remarks, either on policies or personalities or any concerned authorities...It is recommended to avoid writng any such facts or comments which go against the existing government or the country...

Firstly if they expresse their contradictory and opposing opinions in the written papers, then they are not much likely to get through, and even if they manage to get through the written part, they are tested in the interview and given a chance to surrender their maverick ideas and views, and to become a part of a system, and if they still decline or fail to do so, they are out.

Obviously contradictory remarks will honor u negative marks, But it is not correct to say that candidate will be totally, dropped out only coz of this reason, unless he/she has written anything at extreme level...But if u apply this technique especially in ur ESSAY paper u will be in danger zone...So in order to be at the safer side both in written and interview, avoid giving anti govt. remarks or criticism....

regards,

[Sureshlasi]

While sitting in Competitive exam of pakistan and accusing the system and authority will be indirectly challenging the checker. He would either mark some red or disqualify your answer book. An aspirant must intend to be non-biased and patriotic. You can trigger on current conflicts tactfully that It never censures on the govt failure. If you`re not satisfied with the policies and beaucracy, how do you devise to be a part of the system (being a CSP). An intellectual will not let` em observe more than his wish to divulge in the interview.

Before attempting the exam, You must prepare your mind about the feedback of criticism. I`m agreed with Prieti. It`s better to hand the safe side rather than triggering the catastrophe.


Chao,

[aqib]

Well thats the way it goes, u got to go the safer side to avoid any untoward circumstances.And I also agree that if some ppl dont feel satisfied with the prevalent systems and patterns pertaining to bureaucracy and administration, then they cant change the system but they should be atleast given their right to express themselves, and at the end I must quote:

"To dare to differ and refuse to follow or become a part of a pattern are the traits of a genius"..........

[sohailpkdr]

AOA,
As far as my experience is concerned, i have been very open in written portion of css and i wrote wat i felt right but u shud give some good reasons. even i have criticised some policies of govt in interview as well, now let see kya result hoga, but again very glaring and harsh criticism at govt is not advisable.

those who rule were once slaves... mushi didnt become president just like that, he faced hardships of army, took part in wars, had tough training of ssg, was capable enough to be the army chief, then he became president.... remember, if u want to rule, and do whats right u have to be slave first.

what do u think if u get a chance to rule the country by killing a few dozen or over throwing some, you would hesitate ???

just act yes sir yes sir, say that govt is right ...to get in, when time is right, stab the boss.... and become the ruler....

[Xeric]

It is a wrong concept that you cannot write against the Government or their policies. There are some grounds onto which you can write.

You must have the solid reason and by argument you have to prove the government’s policy, which is wrong.

For example you are writing about the topic extremism & war on terror and your notion is that our government is wrong (By helping the West).

If you have the answers of, it’s merits & demerits, it effects on our country, situation of our economy due to joining it, internal security condition and threat to our atomic arms. So you write it that our government is wrong and you will be not deprived of deserving marks.

While extra ordinary praise & admiration (flattering) of the government in any matter does not guarantee the success with out any solid argument.

So remember once again, always prove your notion regarding any matter not only in exams but also in every sphere of life, with solid arguments. The examiner/person will be overwhelmed and he will be stopped. He has to appreciate your knowledge.

The summary of my discussion is “knowledge” if you have knowledge you can go both sides i.e. in favor or against. Try to gain more and more knowledge.


@sibtainafzaal

mushi didnt become.......

It shows that in our country there is no ban "on expression of speech/discussion", which is proved by your statement. You are going to be a CSP (Insha-Allah) & Mr.President is the head of the state so where is the item "Slavery" ?

[khuhro]

I think it is all about that.... you must have knowledge of wrong doings but dont attack on any one's personality. whether he is politician or any one else. so if any one have habbit of attack someones personal attribute or personal behaviour so that he is not sutabile for CSP offices

[oriental]

Originally Posted by aqib

Hello Everyone!

Its a perception that candidates who differ and contradict with the ideas and policies of the govt. and the general prevailing system of bureaucracy are not much encouraged and are quite unlikely to get a chance to become a CSP Officers even if the ones are brilliant in all aspects.
Firstly if they expresse their contradictory and opposing opinions in the written papers, then they are not much likely to get through, and even if they manage to get through the written part, they are tested in the interview and given a chance to surrender their maverick ideas and views, and to become a part of a system, and if they still decline or fail to do so, they are out.
The Moral of the story is they need "Slaves not the Masters".

Dear What do you think,?they need servants not Critics so as they say,in the Rome do as the Romans do.otherwise ......u know what I mean