|
CSS Competitive Examination The Central Superior Services Examination is conducted every year for induction to Group 17 of the Civil Services |
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Is this RIGHT?!?!?!?!
Hello Everyone!
Its a perception that candidates who differ and contradict with the ideas and policies of the govt. and the general prevailing system of bureaucracy are not much encouraged and are quite unlikely to get a chance to become a CSP Officers even if the ones are brilliant in all aspects. Firstly if they expresse their contradictory and opposing opinions in the written papers, then they are not much likely to get through, and even if they manage to get through the written part, they are tested in the interview and given a chance to surrender their maverick ideas and views, and to become a part of a system, and if they still decline or fail to do so, they are out. The Moral of the story is they need "Slaves not the Masters". |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
regards,
__________________
_____________________________________________ A Man Would Do Nothing, If He Waited Until He Could Do It So Well That No One Would Find Fault With What He Has Done. Last edited by prieti; Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 02:01 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
While sitting in Competitive exam of pakistan and accusing the system and authority will be indirectly challenging the checker. He would either mark some red or disqualify your answer book. An aspirant must intend to be non-biased and patriotic. You can trigger on current conflicts tactfully that It never censures on the govt failure. If you`re not satisfied with the policies and beaucracy, how do you devise to be a part of the system (being a CSP). An intellectual will not let` em observe more than his wish to divulge in the interview.
Before attempting the exam, You must prepare your mind about the feedback of criticism. I`m agreed with Prieti. It`s better to hand the safe side rather than triggering the catastrophe. Chao,
__________________
ஜ иστнιπg ιš ιмթΘรรιвlε тσ α ωιℓℓιиg нєαят ஜ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Well thats the way it goes, u got to go the safer side to avoid any untoward circumstances.And I also agree that if some ppl dont feel satisfied with the prevalent systems and patterns pertaining to bureaucracy and administration, then they cant change the system but they should be atleast given their right to express themselves, and at the end I must quote:
"To dare to differ and refuse to follow or become a part of a pattern are the traits of a genius".......... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
AOA,
As far as my experience is concerned, i have been very open in written portion of css and i wrote wat i felt right but u shud give some good reasons. even i have criticised some policies of govt in interview as well, now let see kya result hoga, but again very glaring and harsh criticism at govt is not advisable.
__________________
Sohail Ahmad "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. " (Soren Aabye Kierkegaard) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
those who rule were once slaves... mushi didnt become president just like that, he faced hardships of army, took part in wars, had tough training of ssg, was capable enough to be the army chief, then he became president.... remember, if u want to rule, and do whats right u have to be slave first.
what do u think if u get a chance to rule the country by killing a few dozen or over throwing some, you would hesitate ??? just act yes sir yes sir, say that govt is right ...to get in, when time is right, stab the boss.... and become the ruler.... |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
Last Island (Saturday, January 19, 2008), Omer (Saturday, January 19, 2008), Sureshlasi (Saturday, January 19, 2008) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
It is a wrong concept that you cannot write against the Government or their policies. There are some grounds onto which you can write.
You must have the solid reason and by argument you have to prove the government’s policy, which is wrong. For example you are writing about the topic extremism & war on terror and your notion is that our government is wrong (By helping the West). If you have the answers of, it’s merits & demerits, it effects on our country, situation of our economy due to joining it, internal security condition and threat to our atomic arms. So you write it that our government is wrong and you will be not deprived of deserving marks. While extra ordinary praise & admiration (flattering) of the government in any matter does not guarantee the success with out any solid argument. So remember once again, always prove your notion regarding any matter not only in exams but also in every sphere of life, with solid arguments. The examiner/person will be overwhelmed and he will be stopped. He has to appreciate your knowledge. The summary of my discussion is “knowledge” if you have knowledge you can go both sides i.e. in favor or against. Try to gain more and more knowledge. @sibtainafzaal Quote:
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness. Last edited by Sureshlasi; Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 10:02 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
Sureshlasi (Saturday, January 19, 2008) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
i think
I think it is all about that.... you must have knowledge of wrong doings but dont attack on any one's personality. whether he is politician or any one else. so if any one have habbit of attack someones personal attribute or personal behaviour so that he is not sutabile for CSP offices
__________________
It's Not Over 'til I Win |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
You may be disappointed if you fail, but you are doomed if you don't try. |
|
|