now what??

[qublai khan]

salam
history is a difficult subject especially due different opinions of historians about different figures.just like s.m Burke considers war of 1857 as rebellion against British government (his book [YOUTUBE]was the part of previous FPSC syllabus) but many contemporary writers cinders it war of independence......ch Muhammad ali; the person who gave us the name of our country lived his life in exile(he changed the plan for Pakistan I.e ten states.... thrown out by liaqat Ali khan)......the tyranny of alaudin khilgi in killing his benefactor....controversies of mughals.....


now,for the essay...shell we write what we perceive or what examiner wanted us to perceive??

so my question is....shall we write horrible truth....or sycophantic applause?

[Aik Admi]

Write history as you see it but back your points with evidence, facts and arguments. If too much emotions show up in the paper that 'might' go against you. All you need is a coherent answer. But if you plan to grill someone like Mr Liaquat Ali Khan or sing praises to Mr Gandhi, do so at your own peril. In short, put forth your point but don't overdo your views, least when they don't go with the established opinion.