Subject categoriZation

[shoaib khan12]

Subjects categorisation:
I classify subjects according to the nature of the subject i.e. Analytical subject and scientific subject . If one has some good analytical powers and one thinks that one can convince examiner through his or her writings , one should go for analytical subjects like Histories, laws ( constitutional law and international law ) philosophy,political science, etc . In these subjects we are supposed to write like columnists . We need some strong analytical powers i.e. We should be good in making comparisons , critical evaluations , analysis , elaborations etc.
On the other hand , if we are not good in making discussions , analysis etc we have to go for scientific subjects i.e. Psychology, Geography, Sociology, agriculture, Forestry, Public Administration ,Business Administration etc. These subjects have scientific nature . These got some concepts . Not strong analytical analysis is required. Not strong writing power is needed to convince examiner. Most of us belong to rural background or middle class so got some weak base of English. But i don't think there is a problem because if one got poor IQ , not necessarily, he or she also got poor EQ. People who got good EQ , excel in many fields. For instance , Bill Gates was the dropped student, so was the Walt Disney was rejected because of lacking innovating skills. What i want to make you people understand is that if you people are not good in writings then you people are supposed to dramatise your papers through cartoonish diagrams, flow charts, diagrams, 3D , tables, synopsis, examples from everyday lives etc . These things are easily available in foreign author books . For instance if you people got Psychology then you people must have known about the piaget's theory of cognitive development . In which we study schemas, assimilation and accommodations , represent these concepts in cartoonish presentations . Another good thing of these subjects is that one can easily find the perspectives particular to these subjects like one can find psychoanalysis, behaviourism, gestalt, medical, biological, extentialism , cognitive ; use these perspectives to make criticisms and also during the elaboration o different questions of these subjects. Similarly , one van find structural functional analysis, conflict analysis , and symbolic interaction analysis in sociology ..........
( a passage from my upcoming book (IA) : How do i manage to pass competitive exam- My conclusions)

[RAO RAMEEZ]

Originally Posted by shoaib khan12

Subjects categorisation:
I classify subjects according to the nature of the subject i.e. Analytical subject and scientific subject . If one has some good analytical powers and one thinks that one can convince examiner through his or her writings , one should go for analytical subjects like Histories, laws ( constitutional law and international law ) philosophy,political science, etc . In these subjects we are supposed to write like columnists . We need some strong analytical powers i.e. We should be good in making comparisons , critical evaluations , analysis , elaborations etc.
On the other hand , if we are not good in making discussions , analysis etc we have to go for scientific subjects i.e. Psychology, Geography, Sociology, agriculture, Forestry, Public Administration ,Business Administration etc. These subjects have scientific nature . These got some concepts . Not strong analytical analysis is required. Not strong writing power is needed to convince examiner. Most of us belong to rural background or middle class so got some weak base of English. But i don't think there is a problem because if one got poor IQ , not necessarily, he or she also got poor EQ. People who got good EQ , excel in many fields. For instance , Bill Gates was the dropped student, so was the Walt Disney was rejected because of lacking innovating skills. What i want to make you people understand is that if you people are not good in writings then you people are supposed to dramatise your papers through cartoonish diagrams, flow charts, diagrams, 3D , tables, synopsis, examples from everyday lives etc . These things are easily available in foreign author books . For instance if you people got Psychology then you people must have known about the piaget's theory of cognitive development . In which we study schemas, assimilation and accommodations , represent these concepts in cartoonish presentations . Another good thing of these subjects is that one can easily find the perspectives particular to these subjects like one can find psychoanalysis, behaviourism, gestalt, medical, biological, extentialism , cognitive ; use these perspectives to make criticisms and also during the elaboration o different questions of these subjects. Similarly , one van find structural functional analysis, conflict analysis , and symbolic interaction analysis in sociology ..........
( a passage from my upcoming book (IA) : How do i manage to pass competitive exam- My conclusions)

What about those who have lesser ability to cram the things or memorize and reproduce the sentences as such? There are some people who can't even remember a single sentence but they are able to reproduce the concept in a better way in their own way even better or equivalent to author?? Such people can't remember exact figures even e.g if the figure is 0.53 they cannot memorize it but they develop a concept that the figure was something less then 1...
This is the case when some one tries much harder to cram but still forgets the exact things and even it get worse sometimes that they give stress on one thing more but they forget it and the thing which they studied recklessly, they remember it..

I had actually same problem but I rectified it some how by finding a solution...I find it useful that if such students study a subject from different sources he is likely to reproduce that thing up to mark...
Any one have some other solution? ( I hope I will not receive Zubaida Appa type suggestions like "Aik Sair Badaam Nahaar Munh" )

[shoaib khan12]

I vent asked anthing about cramming ot one should go for cramming well there is some place for craming but not in these subjects

[moazabbas]

Things are added in memory through association, repetition and intensity. No need to cram things. Try to make links. Go through them again and again. And intensity is achieved by involvement.

[khar]

please brother tell me how to use this forum and write a post to seniors csp and take help,,