Friends... Its a reality that we failed but it may be wrong to say that we weren't capable... Than what pushed us to our failure... Lets share our experience of examination so that we may be able to carve out that what went wrong....

1. Lack of attention paid to MCQs
2. Lack of revision
3. Consistently inconsistent
4. Slow pace of writing

I agree U, but some imp points i wana add as my experience: for my attempt I worked tough, burned mid night oil.. Along my graduation I started my preparetion. I even have no problem with english, for which i felt an easy task to pass.. For 8 months i studied 12 to 14 hrs.. I n everyone in my community was sure about my success but on the whole I cant achieve... I myself m confused to carve out what went wrong... I also ask seniors n specialy those who passed 2011' to put some light on it...

__________________
To fail in my life is not to loose; but to learn...

First of all, no need to be disappointed with whatever the result regarding your CSS 2011 was.
I pretty much fall in the similar category of having been unable to qualify.
As long as your mistakes are concerned, let me share an idea that mistakes are not always the things wrongly done but the things done in opposition to what exactly the examiner demands.
Just wait for your dms and have some sort of introspection as to where and how you actually erred.
I think you had better get your expression checked along with the answering technics.
My help will be volunteer in this respect.
Regards,
Ainuddin.

Now taking technical points: I was guided to write precise... Plz tel me' does the length matters...? I would admit my mistake, that 40% of my mcqs may be wrong.. (but not everyday science, it went superb.. ) Guys! Ur replies could make me do it next time as Im willing to improve myself... N surely it will be helpful for majority; as Im in line of majority...:)

__________________
To fail in my life is not to loose; but to learn...

I am sorry to say that I won't be able to give any harsh comments regarding your replies since I see some faults.
You had better PM so that the mistakes can be sorted out.
I would rather suggest you to write just one expansion of your choice and lemme cast a critical eye upon that.

I request you to tell me where ever you find me mistaken.. No matter how harsh ur words may be' i just consider the intension of urs.. Which surely seems to guide me... :cry

__________________
To fail in my life is not to loose; but to learn...

Thanx for being supportive...:-)

__________________
To fail in my life is not to loose; but to learn...

Well as per my observations 60-65% of questions are personal analysis where u are free to analysis the given topic.. If ur english is good enough and u know creative writting then u can give a impressive answer.. Technical questiöns which are 35-40% can be attempted easily if u have seriously prepared... Considering my this observation i cant understand that how can one fail to achieve passing marks... Plz comment...

__________________
To fail in my life is not to loose; but to learn...

As long as your mistakes are concerned, I think you need to put a bit harder work on your expression. I have, in one of my posts, explained as to how one can have more fluent and appropriate use of English vocabulary.
For instance, thesaurus can give you some 12 to 15 synonyms for a single word but we commit a blunder in misunderstanding that every synonym has its own proper place to be used at. Therefore, one had better concentrate on occasional and situational use of words. I have earlier mentioned how to bring such improvement.
Secondly, the students commit a blunder by paying relatively lesser attention to MCQs. If viewed properly, entire portion whether that be the objective portion of subjective portion, basically revolves around Facts and Figures. Subjective is in fact the elaboration of the MCQs.
Similarly, paper solving is itself a technical aspect. For instance, the examiner assumes your last question to be the weakest and would keep in mind your answers as in descending order as long as you solve.
Q # 1 = Best
Q # 2 = Better
Q # 3 = Good
Q # 4 = Weakest
You somehow have to change the sequence and manage your weakest question where examiner expects it the least.
Keep your weakest question at # 3.
there are many more such techniques which we actually lack.