Sunday, April 28, 2024
01:13 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Compulsory Subjects > Current Affairs

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, January 14, 2014
abidturk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KPK,Pakistan
Posts: 129
Thanks: 163
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
abidturk is on a distinguished road
Default Nuclear Policy

In the mid-1970s Pakistan embarked upon the uranium enrichment route to acquiring a nuclear weapons capability. Pakistan conducted nuclear tests in May 1998, shortly after India's nuclear tests, declaring itself a nuclear weapon state. Pakistan currently possesses a growing nuclear arsenal, and remains outside both the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
Capabilities


The most recent open-source estimates, based on 2011 information, indicate that Pakistan possesses between 90 and 110 nuclear weapons.[1] Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris characterize Pakistan as having, "the world's fastest-growing nuclear stockpile."[2] The International Panel on Fissile Materials concluded in 2011 that Pakistan has stockpiled approximately 2.75 ± 1 tons of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and 135 ± 45 kg of weapons-grade plutonium, with plutonium stocks expected to increase significantly as Pakistan brings more production reactors online at its Khushab facility.[3] There is no confirmed data regarding the location and production sites of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, but Islamabad is estimated to possess roughly half-a-dozen storage locations.[4]
History


Establishing a Nuclear Program: 1956 to 1974

Pakistan asserts the origin of its nuclear weapons program lies in its adversarial relationship with India; the two countries have engaged in several conflicts, centered mainly on the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Initial steps toward the development of Pakistan's nuclear program date to the late 1950s, including with the establishment of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) in 1956.[5] President Z.A. Bhutto forcefully advocated the nuclear option and famously said in 1965 that "if India builds the bomb, we will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own."[6] After the December 1971 defeat in the conflict with India, Bhutto issued a directive instructing the country's nuclear establishment to build a nuclear device within three years.[7] India's detonation of a nuclear device in May 1974 further pushed Islamabad to accelerate its nuclear weapons program, although the PAEC had already constituted a group in March of that year to manufacture a nuclear weapon.[8]

A.Q. Khan's Contribution: 1975 to 1998

The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, headed by Munir Ahmad Khan, focused on the plutonium route to nuclear weapons development using material from the safeguarded Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP), but its progress was inefficient due to the constraints imposed by the nuclear export controls applied in the wake of India's nuclear test.[9] Around 1975 A.Q. Khan, a metallurgist working at a subsidiary of the URENCO enrichment corporation in the Netherlands, returned to Pakistan to help his country develop a uranium enrichment program.[10] Having brought centrifuge designs and business contacts back with him to Pakistan, Khan used various tactics, such as buying individual components rather than complete units, to evade export controls and acquire the necessary equipment.[11] By the early 1980s, Pakistan had a clandestine uranium enrichment facility, and A.Q. Khan would later assert that the country had acquired the capability to assemble a first-generation nuclear device as early as 1984.[12]

Pakistan also received assistance from states, and especially China. Beginning in the late 1970s Beijing provided Islamabad with various levels of nuclear and missile-related assistance, including centrifuge equipment, warhead designs, HEU, components of various missile systems, and technical expertise.[13] Eventually, from the 1980s onwards, the Khan network diversified its activities and illicitly transferred nuclear technology and expertise to Iran, North Korea, and Libya.[14] The Khan network was officially dismantled in 2004, although questions still remain concerning the extent of the Pakistani political and military establishment's involvement in the network's activities.[15]

Pakistan as a Declared Nuclear Power: 1998 to the Present

On 11 and 13 May 1998, India conducted a total of five nuclear explosions, which Pakistan felt pressured to respond to in kind.[16] Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif decided to test, and Pakistan detonated five explosions on 28 May and a sixth on 30 May 1998. In a post-test announcement Sharif stressed that the test was a necessary response to India, and that Pakistan's nuclear weapons were only "in the interest of national self-defence… to deter aggression, whether nuclear or conventional."[17]

With these tests Pakistan abandoned its nuclear ambiguity, stating that it would maintain a "credible minimum deterrent" against India.[18] However, Islamabad has refrained from formally declaring a nuclear doctrine, so it remains unclear how this policy might be operationalized and under what conditions Pakistan might cross the nuclear threshold.[19] In 2002 a senior military official asserted that, "nuclear weapons are aimed solely at India," and attempted to define the types of Indian actions that would threaten "the very existence of Pakistan as a state," including Indian threats to Pakistan's territory or military, "economic strangling," or "domestic destabilization."[20] Because of India's conventional military superiority, Pakistan maintains the ability to quickly escalate to the use of nuclear weapons in case of a conventional Indian military attack.[21]
Disarmament and Nonproliferation Policies


Pakistan is not a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Islamabad had expressed opposition to the proposed Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT), insisting instead on the negotiation of a verifiable Fissile Materials Treaty (FMT) that would involve the declaration and reduction of existing fissile materials stocks in order to prevent a permanent gap vis-a-vis India.[22] At the Conference on Disarmament (CD) in January 2011, Pakistan reiterated its opposition to the commencement of negotiations towards an FMCT.[23] While declaring its opposition to the FMCT in its current format at the CD in January 2010, Islamabad called for the CD's agenda to be enlarged to consider aspects of regional conventional arms control and a regime on missile-related issues, while also maintaining its opposition to a treaty that did not cover fissile stocks retroactively.[24]

In general, Pakistan's position on nuclear disarmament is that it will only give up nuclear weapons if India gives up its own nuclear arsenal, and in 2011 the National Command Authority "reiterated Pakistan's desire to constructively contribute to the realization of a world free of nuclear weapons."[25] However, given Islamabad's objective of balancing India's conventional military and nuclear superiority, Pakistan is unlikely to consent to a denuclearization agreement.[26] Islamabad has also consistently refused to sign the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), and from 2009 to 2010 official Pakistani statements indicated that even if India signed the treaty, Islamabad would not necessarily follow suit.[27]

Pakistan is a member of some multilateral programs, including the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism. Islamabad has also put into place more stringent export control mechanisms, including the 2004 Export Control Act and the establishment of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' Strategic Export Control Division (SECDIV) to regulate exports of nuclear, biological, and missile-related products.[28] The Export Control (Licensing and Enforcement) Rules were published in 2009, and in July 2011 Islamabad issued an updated control list including nuclear and missile-related dual-use goods to bring its restrictions in line with those of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), and the Australia Group (AG).[29] Additionally, Pakistan has been involved in the U.S. government's Secure Freight Initiative through the stationing of systems at Port Qasim to scan containers for nuclear and radiological materials.[30]
Nuclear Weapons Security


The security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons has been of significant concern to the international community in recent years, with increased terrorist and insurgent violence and expanded geographical areas of the country under Taliban control. Senior Al Qaeda leaders have also expressed an interest in co-opting Pakistan's nuclear weapons.[31] Such developments increase the likelihood of scenarios in which Pakistan's nuclear security is put at risk. Since 2007, Taliban-linked groups have successfully attacked tightly guarded government and military targets in the country. Militants carried out small-scale attacks outside the Minhas Air Force Base in 2007, 2008, and 2009, and gained access to the site during a two-hour gunfight in August 2012.[32] Pakistani officials have repeatedly denied claims that the base, which houses the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, is also used to store nuclear weapons, and a retired army official asserted that Pakistan's nuclear weapons are stored separately from known military bases.[33] However, several Pakistani nuclear facilities, including the Khushab facility and the Gadwal uranium enrichment plant, are in proximity to areas under attack from the Taliban.[34] Additionally, there have been some attempts to kidnap officials and technicians working at nuclear sites in western Pakistan, although it is not clear who was responsible or what their intentions were.[35]

Nevertheless, Islamabad has consistently asserted that it has control over its nuclear weapons, and that it is impossible for groups such as the Taliban or proliferation networks to gain access to the country's nuclear facilities or weapons. After 11 September 2001 and the exposure of the A.Q. Khan network, Pakistan has taken measures to strengthen the security of its nuclear weapons and installations and to improve its nuclear command and control system.[36] The National Command Authority (NCA), composed of key civilian and military leaders, is the main supervisory and policy-making body controlling Pakistan's nuclear weapons, and maintains ultimate authority on their use.[37] In November 2009, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari announced that he was transferring his role as head of the National Command Authority to the Prime Minister, Yusuf Gilani.[38] The Strategic Plans Division (SPD) is the secretariat of the NCA, and is responsible for operationalizing nuclear doctrine and strategy, managing nuclear safety and security, and implementing the command and control system.[39]

Pakistan has also strengthened its personnel reliability program (PRP) to prevent radicalized individuals from infiltrating the nuclear program, although various experts believe that potential gaps still exist.[40] Pakistani analysts and officials state that they have developed their own version of "permissive action links" or PALs to safeguard their warheads, and have not relied on U.S. assistance for this technology.[41] Nevertheless, in recent years, the United States has provided various levels of assistance to Pakistan to strengthen the security of its nuclear program.[42] According to reports in April 2009, with the expansion of Taliban control in western Pakistan, Islamabad shared some highly classified information about its nuclear program with Western countries in order to reassure them of the country's nuclear security.[43]
Civilian Nuclear Cooperation


Pakistan has been critical of the U.S.-India nuclear cooperation agreement, but at the same time has periodically sought a similar arrangement for itself, a demand Washington has so far turned down.[44] In 2008 Islamabad pushed for a criteria-based exemption to the rules of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), which unlike the country-based exception benefiting only India could have made Pakistan eligible for nuclear cooperation with NSG members. Despite its reservations about the India special exception, Islamabad joined other members of the Board of Governors in approving India's safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in August 2008.[45] At the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington in April 2010, Islamabad again sought "non-discriminatory access" to civilian nuclear technology, while also offering nuclear fuel cycle services covered by IAEA safeguards to the international community.[46]

In response to the U.S.-India deal, Pakistan has sought to increase its civilian nuclear cooperation with China. Under a previous cooperation framework China had supplied Pakistan with two pressurized water reactors, Chashma 1 and Chashma 2, which entered into commercial operation in 2000 and 2011 respectively.[47] In April 2010, reports confirmed long-standing rumors that the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) had agreed to supply two additional 650-MW power reactors to Pakistan, as Chashma 3 and Chashma 4.[48] These reactors are currently under construction and will also be placed under IAEA safeguards.[49] China, a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group since 2004, has not pursued an exemption to NSG guidelines for Pakistan, instead arguing that Chashma 3 and 4 can be "grandfathered" in under the pre-2004 Sino-Pakistan nuclear framework.[50] While the United States has consistently rejected this argument, the deal has been accepted as a "fait accompli" in international fora such as the NSG and the IAEA.[51]
Recent Development and Current Status


In recent years, Pakistan has continued to expand its nuclear weapons program, both in terms of delivery systems and through the construction of more sophisticated warheads, proceeding from HEU to plutonium-based devices.[52] In 1998, Pakistan commissioned its first plutonium production reactor at Khushab, which is capable of yielding between 6 and 12 kg of weapons-grade plutonium annually.[53] According to analyses in 2010, a second plutonium production reactor of similar size at the same site is likely to have begun operations by late 2009.[54] Construction of a third plutonium production reactor at Khushab began in 2006, and satellite imagery analysis in September 2010 suggested that construction is proceeding at a brisk pace, leading to possible completion in the near future.[55] Associated facilities are also being expanded, especially plutonium separation facilities at New Labs, Pakistan Institute of Science and Technology, to reprocess spent fuel from the new reactors at Khushab.[56] Thus, Islamabad appears to be expanding and diversifying its nuclear weapons capability through the plutonium route's more compact and powerful warheads in its quest for a secure second-strike capability against India.[57]
__________________
He who has never learned to obey cannot be a good commander.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to abidturk For This Useful Post:
rizwanjamill (Tuesday, October 18, 2016)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Education Policy 2009 Raja Bahar Pakistan Affairs 0 Sunday, June 10, 2012 06:32 PM
Pakistan's Nuclear Pro gramme alternative scenarios maverick786 Essays 0 Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:21 PM
China's Nuclear Environment and the US Theatre Missile Defence Initiative Nek Muhammad International Relations 0 Monday, July 05, 2010 05:38 PM
U.s. Nuclear Policy Toward Iran fahad269 News & Articles 0 Sunday, December 23, 2007 08:15 PM
History of Iranian Nuclear Programme Naseer Ahmed Chandio News & Articles 0 Tuesday, May 30, 2006 02:07 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.