[QUOTE=zareenkhan;316847]It is an idea, Scorpio. It can be expanded from a number of angles. My ideas may vary from yours. So is the case with everyone. Its justification is judged by the gravity of arguments given in favour or against the idea.[/QUOTE]
Your version is correct. I checked it up. And the reason i was curiousto know was that I attempted it in the paper. Turns out I was wrong! Precise and Composition was supposed to be my best paper :(

[QUOTE=zareenkhan;314989]This adage means that the attitudes of the adults commensurate with the qualities of their childhood. An honest man is the product of upbringing of an honest child, while a stubborn child, on the other hand, will develop his personality accordingly. Therefore, the personality traits of an individual become visible during his early age.

Generally, all the adults develop their personal attributes in conformity to their childhood attributes. If the child possesses the characteristics of love and kindness, it will surely bring up a peaceful adult within him. Hazrat Halima, for example, bears testimony to the fact that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) had been very kind and generous during his childhood. Later days, he became the liberator of humanity. Similarly, Picasso, the great artiste, manifested the artistic character during his childhood so much, that his master claimed that he would be surpassed by the young lad. On the contrary, Adolf Hitler harboured a stubborn child within him during his early age. Consequently, he became one of the most cruel man the world has ever seen. Thus, the child reveals its future as an adult.

However, some of the people do not develop their personalities in accordance with their childhood attitudes. Issac Newton and Albert Einstein provide such examples who, unlike their adulthood, were below par at learning during childhood. Yet, the personalities of a great majority of people are shaped in concordance with their childhood qualities. It is, therefore, suggested that the grooming of a child must receive special attention. A great deal of care must be taken in its upbringing so that it may become an invaluable asset to the people.[/QUOTE]

i am not too sure that we should quote too many examples in an expansion or paragraph.......we should expand the topic though proper logic and reasoning.

[QUOTE=zareenkhan;316891]Aaaaaaannnnnnnnnn ahaaaan ahaaaan.....:cry
koi kah raha hai ek para likho, koi kahta hai 3 likho, koi kahta hai no hard and fast rule...:cry
maine nhn karni hai koi tayari... hato ji... menu jan do... :cry[/QUOTE]

jab ap kisi ko apni koi effort judge krny ko kaho gy tou wo tou suggestions dy ga na???:blink and they say k "ZUBAAN-E-KHALQ KO NAQARA-E-KHUDA SMJHO" tou consider what the people are saying... specially the seniors.... ore itnee jaldi give up nai krty:)
stay blessed

[QUOTE=zareenkhan;316891]Aaaaaaannnnnnnnnn ahaaaan ahaaaan.....:cry
koi kah raha hai ek para likho, koi kahta hai 3 likho, koi kahta hai no hard and fast rule...:cry
maine nhn karni hai koi tayari... hato ji... menu jan do... :cry[/QUOTE]

AoA

Respected fellow, if examiner is asking you to write paragraph thn you should have to compose it in a paragraph. Conversely, if the examiner asks to write a note/expansion thn you can expand it into two or three paragraphs.

However, firstly you should see the question, what he is asking for! thn make a rough idea in your mind and on the end page of answering sheet, which you will be using for rough work for jotting ideas for precis/paragraph etc.

Further, there is no need to give up for the sake of others.

No no. I'm not taking it to my heart. I know perception varies accordingly. It's great to be here since we learn many things.

Syntax is surly not impressive. The point that it wont be able to tip the scale of average score- stands true! 7-8/20.

[QUOTE=alisaeed01;321179]Syntax is surly not impressive. The point that it wont be able to tip the scale of average score- stands true! 7-8/20.[/QUOTE]

Syntax means? And would you please tell me how to make that syntax thing more impressive? Thanking in advance.

[QUOTE=zareenkhan;321389]Syntax means? And would you please tell me how to make that syntax thing more impressive? Thanking in advance.[/QUOTE]
You will have to consult newspapers and sift aside specific parlance, frequently used by editors. Secondly, you must have noted two main things, a specific lexicon which is compulsorily functional and a typical orchestration of words. They play with simple words but in immaculate articulation. Read a sentence and write it in your own words then compare it with the editor's. Both will surly be conveying same meanings but in sheer different ways.

Okay. Probably I got your point. You mean to say my vocab is not refined. Don't you? And for that matter, I'll hardly get 7 marks regardless of every other effort put in that expansion. Right? Well, thank you for your flowery suggestion. I fear it may cause me hives. Let's see. But next time, try to encourage the new members. No offence please.:D

[QUOTE=zareenkhan;321885]Okay. Probably I got your point. You mean to say my vocab is not refined. Don't you? And for that matter, I'll hardly get 7 marks regardless of every other effort put in that expansion. Right? Well, thank you for your flowery suggestion. I fear it may cause me hives. Let's see. But next time, try to encourage the new members. No offence please.:D[/QUOTE]
Oh no you don't. Your sentence structure is really weak. So now, should I encourage you?