[QUOTE=mariashamshad;559068]Oh dear ,to get rid of typing a long rule I said to read that page:)....[/QUOTE]

Actually, i don't have any book, therefore you really have to write your discovery here :)

[QUOTE=wajid Kiani;559072]Actually, i don't have any book, therefore you really have to write your discovery here :)[/QUOTE]
:thinking:laughing
Ok let me type then:)

In assertive sentences merely future time is denoted by " shall" in first person and " will " in the second and third person.
Thus we should say
I shall read.
He will reAd.
You will read.
We shall read.
When however a " command" or " promise" or " intention" is to be expressed the " shall" is used with the second and third persons.
Shall is used with the second and third persons to combine future time with an implied command.like,
He shall go( i command you to go).
If you do this, you shall be hanged( threat).

[QUOTE=mariashamshad;559086]In assertive sentences merely future time is denoted by " shall" in first person and " will " in the second and third person.
Thus we should say
I shall read.
He will reAd.
You will read.
We shall read.
When however a " command" or " promise" or " intention" is to be expressed the " shall" is used with the second and third persons.
Shall is used with the second and third persons to combine future time with an implied command.like,
He shall go( i command you to go).
If you do this, you shall be hanged( threat).[/QUOTE]

Who is the writer of the book?
As per my knowledge will implies the "will" of someone and shall implies the necessity.

[QUOTE=wajid Kiani;559093]Who is the writer of the book?
As per my knowledge will implies the "will" of someone and shall implies the necessity.[/QUOTE]

It's "exploring the world of English"recommended by every teacher and csp,s.
Well I have consulted from two other books also. One is of wren n Martin.

[QUOTE=mariashamshad;559095]It's "exploring the world of English"recommended by every teacher and csp,s.
Well I have consulted from two other books also. One is of wren n Martin.[/QUOTE]

I may be wrong :hurt, but still doubtful. :thinking

[QUOTE=wajid Kiani;559096]I may be wrong :hurt, but still doubtful. :thinking[/QUOTE]

Ok confirm it then. It,s rather better.

[QUOTE=mariashamshad;559068]Oh dear ,to get rid of typing a long rule I said to read that page:)....[/QUOTE]

Now that's the problem Maria. It's not showing any sense of order or command..
simple future tense is used there .
And i told you about structure of [B]not only [/B] sentences earlier.


YEs Wajid, you are quite closer.

[QUOTE=Waqas77;559102]Now that's the problem Maria. It's not showing any sense of order or command..
simple future tense is used there .
And i told you about structure of [B]not only [/B] sentences earlier.


YEs Wajid, you are quite closer.[/QUOTE]



I am sure, i am, but problem is that i don't have page 438 for interpretation :pp

Dear Wajid and Maria,

Please both of you go through [B]Page # 468 of Sadaat's[/B] to get the exact structure of NOT ONLY.....
then do let me know what you people reflect?