FPSC is actually trying to shape coming CSPs into Researchers and Analysts !!! :0:0:0 During preparation now we have to analyse things by ourselves, we have to think in every corner of each topic...:thinking:thinking

Yes true. Making our opinion needs a great amount of reading.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dear derawall how you see book of IR which is published by jwt?????

My name: Tayyab Mughal. :)

I was thinking to buy one. I heard that it's to the point so will help in notes making.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=Irfan Jan;848105]It seems that FPSC has eliminated the most of the portion of the Pakistan Affair and has limited the history part. Surprisingly, the syllabus more enlightens about the current affair.

Discussion will be appreciated.[/QUOTE]
History portion is limited but one can not ignore it. So many questions from past papers of the subject are there which can be asked in CE 16 bcz first 2 portions and No. 5.6.10.12.15.22. and 23 are related to history. In my opinion except a few additional topics previous sullybus is narrated into bullets.

Rote learning has been discouraged this time.

[QUOTE=Malik Safdar Abbas;848498]History portion is limited but one can not ignore it. So many questions from past papers of the subject are there which can be asked in CE 16 bcz first 2 portions and No. 5.6.10.12.15.22. and 23 are related to history. In my opinion except a few additional topics previous sullybus is narrated into bullets.[/QUOTE]
Yes you are right. Each and every topic has its own history, we can not skip as it looks. But now emphasize has been shifted towards contemporary issues so it is not very easy to grasp everything in one hand.

[QUOTE=Malik Safdar Abbas;848498]History portion is limited but one can not ignore it. So many questions from past papers of the subject are there which can be asked in CE 16 bcz first 2 portions and No. 5.6.10.12.15.22. and 23 are related to history. In my opinion except a few additional topics previous sullybus is narrated into bullets.[/QUOTE]
I know , knowledge of history is necessary, if one doesn't even know the names of all the generals and their action, how are they going to analyze civil military relations.
That's why I have already opted history of indopak :)

[QUOTE=Nazish Hina;848512]I know , knowledge of history is necessary, if one doesn't even know the names of all the generals and their action, how are they going to analyze civil military relations.
That's why I have already opted history of indopak :)[/QUOTE]
lolxxx You have to opt Indo Pak just for the sake of remembering the name of the generals we have to ruined our history. It never happen and this time specially, there is not interdependency between PA and Indo Pak

Ruined or made , we have to remember. Nations learn from history.

But I opted it because I LOVED it. :cool:

you think there's no interdependency (which doesn't seem like a real word)
BUT
Others think there IS a link. learn to accept that human beings are capable of having a difference of opinion.