|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unfair and confusing policy of FPSC in certain subjects in CSS 2009
Dear members i just want to mention that in CSS 2009 certain subjects marks were all time low.for example Political Science,International Relation,Constitutional Law,Computer Science and Business Administration.I have looked at the mark sheets of a lot of students and almost all got very low marks.I myself suffered in 2009 CSS due to these marking trends.Now i feel hesitant in appearing in CSS 2010 because it seems CSS follow certain trends in certain subjects.Senior members plz comment on this.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Austin For This Useful Post: | ||
ali_ali (Friday, October 30, 2009), fahadfa (Friday, October 30, 2009), SikanderHayat007 (Friday, October 30, 2009) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
same case iz here with me in IR paper.......i attempted 12 correct mcqs and required questions almost accurately.......but i ve been given only 26 marks....
can any b body explian this bizarre assessment....... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
M-M-M |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mumtaz Hayat Maneka For This Useful Post: | ||
Dr.Ehsan ilahi (Thursday, November 05, 2009) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Thanx very much! Regards! Fahad F. A. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
well in my observation , different patterns of marks in some subjects depends upon the aptitude of the checker as well
a csp told me , at his ctp one of his teacher who was also a checker had a degree from UK (masters in linguistics) , he said after seeing his teacher s standard of english , students were unable to believe how did they even managed to pass , checkers like these suggest the low passing rate in the essay paper similar checkers might be there in some subjects who expect an extraordinary standard ,in ur case international relations !! we all know dr hasan askari rizvi also gives lectures in ctp , if he is one of the checkers , than u might rethink the level of analysis he might be expecting , |
|
|