Just Surfing And Got This .....

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION , 2009
MARKS SHEET
:: Roll Number 3380

:Candidate Name : ALI HASSAN





Essay 26
English 27
General Knowledge 147
Islamiat 61


History of Pak and India
Paper A 75
Paper B 74 149
International LAW 75
Journalism 52
Musilm LAW and Jurisprudance 41
Punjabi 83
Total Marks
FAILED IN COMPULSORY 607 He Got 400 Marks Just In Optional !!!

My Marks

Essay:40
Precise: 49
Islamiat: 62
Pakistan Affairs:34
Everyday Science: 51
Current Affairs:45

Economics:98
Geography:101
IR: 42
Pushto: 58

TOTAL: 580

Try to think out of the box. Don't follow the herd. Come up with some new angles. Give a novel touch to your answers, avoid bookish style and don't reproduce academy notes as it is in the paper. Remain analytical and reply in an empirical way. Enhance your linkage formation guts. Even if you have to form a link of current issue with any distant past issue you should be quick enough to connect it logically. Don't criticize without solid reasons and don't indulge in useless oily tongue. Remain pro Pakistani with sound opinions. Try to defend official stance. Avoid conspiracy theories.

Broaden your thinking horizon and remain grammatically correct with nice sentence and paragraph structuring. Passing essay is then no issue at all.

Agreed but great Allah ky bandy assessors can lead to new heights. This time preparation of Islamic History has not worked infact the great assessor has worked well.

oh-really bad luck.However it is not the end of life and best of luck for future.But pl. share how could u manage to score 69 marks in M.law?what techniques did u use in ur prep. and attempting the paper.pl . do share.Is M.Law really that much scoring?Or ur result is an exceptional case and how?
with regards and best wishes
ASAD

* minimum score of indo-pak is even 84. Please check before posting wrong info.

Regards

well dear i am agreed that few subjects did exceptionally good this time including islamic history. But tell me one thing when a student fails in a sub or gets below average marks its solely his responsibility, not of assessors, then y when some one shows great performance in any sub, we lov to underestimate his/her abilities by giving full credit to assessors. there could be sm novelty or a hard work on part of tha student so its time to encourage those near misses rather than taking the credit away frm them,,,,,,,,,,,,,hope there is nothing to mind but to change attitude lil bit.
thanks

hii eveeryone,
it is very strange to see that some subjects are strictely checked and others are awarded high marks. Isn't it very astonishing that a candidate who has secured least marks in the cumpulsory subjects, nevertheless has secured marvelous in the history. this is totaqlly irreational and illogical. i think cumpulsory subjects are the sole criteria for determining the competency of candidate and not the optional subjects

__________________
in this market place of noices and reverberation nobody hears and understands a simple____silence.

Roll No 2842


Essay 32 ( my bad)
English 42
EDS 53
CA 62
PA 35 ( my bad)
ISL 58


Optional

CL 53
Indo Pak Paper 1 76
Ido Pak paper 2 74
Pol Sci 1 51
Pol sci 2 33 ( my Bad)
P Ad 63

MY DMC Roll No. 2673

English 45
Composition 45
EDS 45
CA 40
PA 40
Islamiat 51

Political science 86
Maths 87
muslim Law 62
C Law 34

Total 535
Failed in aggregate

This DMC proves that although Political Science was low scoring this year, Maths should never be kept as an optional subject. I know this because I have studied Applied Maths for a while and know its sheer depth and vastness. It is just not practical to cover its entirety even if one is Masters in Maths.

No Offence to Mathematicians.

__________________
Regards