Saturday, April 27, 2024
12:50 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2013 Exam
2% passed only? My question is how and why 2% passed only? My question is how and why

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
Page 10 of 10 « First 6789 10
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #91  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
umarabbas's Avatar
42nd CTP (PSP)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 62
  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Multan
Posts: 670
Thanks: 24
Thanked 627 Times in 325 Posts
umarabbas has a spectacular aura aboutumarabbas has a spectacular aura aboutumarabbas has a spectacular aura about
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohammad Ali View Post
I could agree to all the points going in favor of FPSC but the 2 percent passing ratio is irksome and unbelievable to the core and something I cannot concur with being fair. Politics must have seeped through the process. I sense stark presence of nepotism, very particularly in CE-2013.
Nepotism? To favor whom and why?
__________________
Umar Abbas Babar
I Know I am Bad But When Bad is the Best, Bad is the Only Choice
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Karachi
Posts: 571
Thanks: 113
Thanked 233 Times in 166 Posts
Mohammad Ali is on a distinguished road
Default 2% Passing Ratio Is a Fraud
Who are haves of Pakistan? The political elites in this country get their family and friends inducted to civil bureaucracy; no matter how transparent a means to induction appears to your eyes, it must accommodate the wishes of political bosses. Only 40% hiring is validly done, the rest is just deception, my friend, pure deception; CE-2013 best exposed it. Officers retire annually, some are unfortunately expired or injured, some for other purposes leave, thousands of seats go vacant every year but just peanut vacancies are announced for general public and now even those vacancies are robbed of merit to a considerable extent; this is but unfortunate and detestable.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mohammad Ali For This Useful Post:
nisma khan (Saturday, November 30, 2013)
  #93  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
Raja4u's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Karachi, Islamabad
Posts: 393
Thanks: 85
Thanked 199 Times in 129 Posts
Raja4u is on a distinguished road
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohammad Ali View Post
Who are haves of Pakistan? The political elites in this country get their family and friends inducted to civil bureaucracy; no matter how transparent a means to induction appears to your eyes, it must accommodate the wishes of political bosses. Only 40% hiring is validly done, the rest is just deception, my friend, pure deception; CE-2013 best exposed it. Officers retire annually, some are unfortunately expired or injured, some for other purposes leave, thousands of seats go vacant every year but just peanut vacancies are announced for general public and now even those vacancies are robbed of merit to a considerable extent; this is but unfortunate and detestable.
Agreed.
As there are many deserving members of this forum who could not make it through, and there are several names who we have had never heard. There is a clear clue of nepotism and induction of elite class.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Here somewhere
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The Imp is on a distinguished road
Default
A number of people who had qualified last year have failed this time. Which means they were good enough to be civil servants last year but this year they are not. They should be disqualified now, I demand. All of 'em
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Imp For This Useful Post:
  #95  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bahawalpur
Posts: 23
Thanks: 6
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
riziirao is on a distinguished road
Default
plz dont call CSS prestigious exam... its just a quota exam... no transparency
__________________
"Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal" (Henry Ford)
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
umarabbas's Avatar
42nd CTP (PSP)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 62
  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Multan
Posts: 670
Thanks: 24
Thanked 627 Times in 325 Posts
umarabbas has a spectacular aura aboutumarabbas has a spectacular aura aboutumarabbas has a spectacular aura about
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohammad Ali View Post
Who are haves of Pakistan? The political elites in this country get their family and friends inducted to civil bureaucracy; no matter how transparent a means to induction appears to your eyes, it must accommodate the wishes of political bosses. Only 40% hiring is validly done, the rest is just deception, my friend, pure deception; CE-2013 best exposed it. Officers retire annually, some are unfortunately expired or injured, some for other purposes leave, thousands of seats go vacant every year but just peanut vacancies are announced for general public and now even those vacancies are robbed of merit to a considerable extent; this is but unfortunate and detestable.
Speechless brother speechless Thousands of seats, 40% hiring etc!
__________________
Umar Abbas Babar
I Know I am Bad But When Bad is the Best, Bad is the Only Choice
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old Thursday, November 21, 2013
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Introvert
Posts: 235
Thanks: 47
Thanked 88 Times in 66 Posts
Bonaparte is on a distinguished road
Default
Those who are defending FPSC must see this and answer me please.
I wont declare names but my some mates including me desperately need answers behind this illogical approach.

Candidate 1:-

Psychology A: 65
Psychology B:12

Candidate 2:-

English Essay:6
English Precis:49

Besides,there are hundred and thousands of candidates including me have badly suffered such difference in marking then at what logic people here defending FPSC?? Answer me? Why this thing happened first time in the history of CSS with not only one candidates but many ?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonaparte For This Useful Post:
Raja4u (Friday, November 22, 2013)
  #98  
Old Friday, November 22, 2013
Raja4u's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Karachi, Islamabad
Posts: 393
Thanks: 85
Thanked 199 Times in 129 Posts
Raja4u is on a distinguished road
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
Those who are defending FPSC must see this and answer me please.
I wont declare names but my some mates including me desperately need answers behind this illogical approach.

Candidate 1:-

Psychology A: 65
Psychology B:12

Candidate 2:-

English Essay:6
English Precis:49

Besides,there are hundred and thousands of candidates including me have badly suffered such difference in marking then at what logic people here defending FPSC?? Answer me? Why this thing happened first time in the history of CSS with not only one candidates but many ?
Journalism has always been my favorite subject. Last time i got 65 marks with one wrong question and 12 correct mcqs. This time 16 correct mcqs and 4 comprehensive and analytical theory answers got me total 37 marks.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Raja4u For This Useful Post:
Bonaparte (Saturday, November 23, 2013)
Reply
Page 10 of 10 « First 6789 10

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

CSS Forum - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.