Css2015 - Page 20

tayyaba786 · #**191** Monday, July 07, 2014

Aoa i am interested to know about CSS.. I am doing MS physics and i am planing to give CSS exam. May optional subject is physics. I want to know that can i choose optional other than my field. If yes then what would be better?

zoyaayoub · #**192** Monday, July 07, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by tayyaba786

Aoa i am interested to know about CSS.. I am doing MS physics and i am planing to give CSS exam. May optional subject is physics. I want to know that can i choose optional other than my field. If yes then what would be better?

yes dear you can choose any subject of your interest. u may not even opt physics. all of it depends on your interest
regards

Aliinaa · #**193** Monday, July 07, 2014

Aoa everybody. So let's discuss Pak-US relations today.

zoyaayoub · #**194** Monday, July 07, 2014

i haven't been a part of such discussions ever so i want you to start alina

i will try to participate as per my scarce knowledge about int'll affairs

Aliinaa · #**195** Monday, July 07, 2014

@Zoya : Oh, don't worry. Even I don't have much knowledge. Let's wait for the others as well!

LUTUF ALI · #**196** Monday, July 07, 2014

everyone seems to absent even today, were not we supposed to have a discussion today?

Aliinaa · #**197** Monday, July 07, 2014

How will the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan affect U.S.-Pakistan relations?

LUTUF ALI · #**198** Monday, July 07, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliinaa

How will the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan affect U.S.-Pakistan relations?

Withdrawal of USA army from Afghanistan will lead to nothing but an unstable Afghanistan, which will strengthen the insurgents at pak Afghan border hence more trouble for Pakistan. The pak USA relationship although not directly but of course indirectly will have a negative impact of withdrawal of USA army from Afghanistan

Khadija Noor · #**199** Monday, July 07, 2014

Dear All,
I appreciate Alina's initation

. Keep it up.

Well about the withdrawl of NATO forces impact on PK-US relations; it has been demonstrated by many people as it would going to be the new phase of "Abandonment" of US from Pakistan. The ebbs of the history manifest the wave of crust (1950, 1980, early 2000) & trough (1960, most of the 1970, 1990) in the relationship between washington & Islamabad. Pakistan had gotten paranoid when US supported India in 1960's era war against China, despite that India was ally of Russia. These differences further accentuated with 1965 war, 1971 separation of East Pakistan & Kashmir dispute etc when US did not support Pakistan but these were minor differences; it didnt change Pakistan's Foreign policy vicinity. But leaving the pakistan in adversity after cold war is more horrified for Islamabad officials. Moreover, With the breakthough into war on terror, the Islamist militants directed towards Pakistan territory with the motto of "Enemy Friend is enemy" so in no time Taliban, those were created by Pakistani establishment with the abet of US to disintegrate USSR, turned into Terrorits. Ironically, again the vulnerable repercussion faced by Pakistan alone. Pakistan cried that US did not support it at the time of dead need. Pakistan want to undergo in the same nuclear arsenal agreement as it had been undergone with India. But US did not give any heed despite all the scarifices of Pakistani civilians & military. Pakistan lost of lives, infrastructure damaged & coping with insurgents alone are nothing for US. Us have always been of the stance "Do More. Do More". They were reiteratively addressed: "Pakistan has ties with Haqqani Network". Abbottabad operation, Raymond Davis issue & salala attack all were lead to the barrier for NATO supply route which further exaggerated the hatred at both ends. So, with this prolonged evidence of history stamped the love and hatred relationship between the washington & islamabad. Th4y neither live together with harmony nor divorce each other. So current scenario speaks about cold relationship at both ends as per post 2014 nATO withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Note: This is just a general review as per my analysis ( it might be critically erroneous) Corrections & suggestions are always appreciated

Prayers,
Khadija

Quote:

Originally Posted by WasimBhai

Pakistan China Economic Corridor

The train link between China and Pakistan will be another chapter in the much sought after integration of Pakistan with China across economic and strategic domains. While it is true that it will open new avenues for businesses on both side, a more fundamental question has to be answered. Concretely, at what cost does all of it come? Does the incumbents in the federal government have done any studies on the possible effects of this relationship on the small and medium size traders in Pakistan? More importantly, how is this burgeoning relationship different from the client like status of Pakistani state vis-a-vis USA during the 1960s'?

These are important questions to answer because as we have seen more in the chequered political history of Pakistan, the state has invariably been reactive in its responses to disasters. Furthermore, the situation in Balochistan is precarious to say the least. How is the state planning to provide security to labor who will be essential to making this project get through to completion? These are answers that need to be answered before joining the roaring chorus. The people of this land have already suffered enormously because of ill-thought out advertures of their elites and they surely deserve better.

Is it any good?

I appreciate your attempt. Its really good

. Keep writing

Quote:

Originally Posted by HUNK007

Pak China Corridor
Pak-China cooperation in different spheres of activity is a glaring example of trust that both countries share. The recent projects like Kashgar-Gawadar railway track, Karachi-Lahore motorway and Pakistan’s first metro train project in Lahore, are just a few examples in this regard. The question that arises is what has made Sino Pak relations so strong that it has passed almost all the litmus tests of time? The answer is so simple; it is not the love for each other but the mutual interests which play a major role in developing international relations. Pakistan’s geopolitical location and china’s cold relations with India - a threat to china’s future as an Asian leader- have kept both china and Pakistan to share strong ties.
The Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif did not take long in capitalizing china’s interest in the region. As a result of that, he proposed a railway link from Kashgar to Gawadar. Gawadr being the shortest and cheapest alternative route to import oil from central Asian energy rich countries and beyond, is an apple of the eye of china- teasing her to spend billions of dollars on it. The new projects like road and railway links would not only bolster china’s aspirations of becoming the most sustainable economy in the globe, but, also, would bring an era of prosperity in Pakistan. The intention of the Prime Minister is clear with the statement that he wanted to make Gawadar a free port on lines with Singapore and Hongkong. The railway link with china would play a major role in accomplishing the task of rapid economic growth for the traditional friendly neighbours.
But the thing that is to be concerned is deteriorating law and order situation in balochistan-sponsored by USA and India- which may keep Sino-Pak aspirations at bay. It is need of the time that severe action should be taken against non-stake actors so that order remains in the land and Pak-China cooperation bears its maximum fruit.

Very nice attempt. Keep going

.

@hopefully, Your attempt is very appreciatable

. Keep it up!!
Moreover, it doesnt matter if we add any point which is not present in original para. We are not doing precise yet; we are just practicing & ameliorating our writing skills

.

@Aliina, Hopefully & Zoya..I duly appreciate all the three girls active participation on this thread. Please keep posting, practing & guiding.
No doubt, Allah help those who help themselves & others.

@exclusively & @Bhudda, your constructive contribution is appreciatable. Please keep on posting

Bless you all.

@all new members, please join. We truly appreciate your contribution. Any other member can join anytime

Prayers,
Khadija

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muhammad Zia Rana

AOA Friends and Miss Khadija Also,,,
I am in also interested in this and i am going o start the preparation of CSS 2015 Exams.... And Kindly i need help from you guys to make my preparation Better....

Welcome to the group. Please start contributing & practicing

Prayers,
Khadija

WasimBhai · #**200** Monday, July 07, 2014

In her magnum opus on Pakistani judicial history, Paula R Newberg states, 'constitutions at once represent the aspirations as well as disappointments of a society.' For the people of FATA, the consitition has only been a disappointment. Burried under the pejorative vernacular of 'Pathans are wild, warriors, an intractable community of warlords', the abject suffering of Pakhtun people are never discussed in the mainstream. And FCR, the legal framework that governs the people of FATA is probably the most glaring example of this inhuman attitude toward the Pakhtun nation by the state.

A product of colonialism, FCR has evolved over the years but has failed miserably to amerliorate the conditions of common Pakhtun living in FATA areas. Even the measures taken by last government remained largerly unimplemented. Collective punishment, that inhuman vestige of colonial rule remains with no jurisdiction of either Higher or Supreme courts. Add to that the strategic games played by security agencies, the Pakhtuns has suffered immeasurably in every possible way.

Today, more than ever before, it is enormously important that the state integrates FATA more tightly into the Pakistani state. Either FATA becomes a separate province, or is ruled by a council akin Gilgit-Baltistan or amalgamated into KPK, the state must decide with alacrity. To let it fester will bring only disaster, and that is one thing Pakistan can not afford in the post 2014 scenario when US forces leave Afghanistan and the latter most probably will be facing huge challenges to the nascent state.

Is it any good?

The Following User Says Thank You to zoyaayoub For This Useful Post:
Aliinaa (Monday, July 07, 2014)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LUTUF ALI For This Useful Post:
Aliinaa (Monday, July 07, 2014), Harriee (Friday, August 01, 2014)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aliinaa For This Useful Post:
Harriee (Friday, August 01, 2014), LUTUF ALI (Monday, July 07, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to LUTUF ALI For This Useful Post:
Harriee (Friday, August 01, 2014)