Css2015 - Page 27

LUTUF ALI · #**261** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by mhz99

Muslims are divided into sects with each claiming the other ones as non-believers. Shia-Sunni rift has divided the whole middle east. Shia group is led by Iran and Sunni group is headed by Saudi Arabia. Bashar Al Assad (Shia) has not been toppled yet as he is supported by Iran and Hezbullah despite the fact that Sunnis are in majority in Syria. Similarly Saudia played an important role in crushing the uprising in Bahrain as it was Sunni controlled. So much so Saudia wanted USA to attack Iran and teach it a lesson.

Dear sir there are few theories that USA is Shia supporter and will never attack on any Shia government or rebel group. The example can be seen in Iraq-Syria region where in Iraq controlled by Shia government USA is supporting the government against the insurgents but on contrary in Syria USA is supporting Shia insurgents against government. What are your view about these theories.?

mhz99 · #**262** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Syria is governed by Shia subgroup Alawite and the insurgents are Sunnis. ISIS is also a Sunni organization. USA was ready to attack Syria but due to diplomatic efforts of Russia this was averted. The West says that the alternative of Bashar Al Assad is even worse than him. It has nothing to do with secterianism

LUTUF ALI · #**263** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by mhz99

USA was ready to attack but due to diplomatic efforts of Russia this was averted. The West says that the alternative of Bashar Al Assad is even worse than him. It has nothing to do with secterianism

Than what is the purpose according to you behind the grants allocation for insurgents groups in Syria

mhz99 · #**264** Saturday, July 12, 2014

There are different groups operating in Syria, the "moderate" groups are being supported by West. These so called moderate groups are serving dual purposes; fighting the extremist groups and weakening Assad government

Aliinaa · #**265** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUTUF ALI

Dear sir there are few theories that USA is Shia supporter and will never attack on any Shia government or rebel group. The example can be seen in Iraq-Syria region where in Iraq controlled by Shia government USA is supporting the government against the insurgents but on contrary in Syria USA is supporting Shia insurgents against government. What are your view about these theories.?

Umm, I am a bit confused. Arn't both the governments in Syria and Iraq Shia governments? Besides, I don't believe in such theories because US has long sided with Saudi ( especially before US-Iran talks). So what would say about that?

mhz99 · #**266** Saturday, July 12, 2014

USA sides with its national interest unlike Muslim countries

LUTUF ALI · #**267** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliinaa

Umm, I am a bit confused. Arn't both the governments in Syria and Iraq Shia governments? Besides, I don't believe in such theories because US has long sided with Saudi ( especially before US-Iran talks). So what would say about that?

Well the anti government forces in Iraq are sunni but in Syria most of rebellions are Shia except the alqaida and ISIS part. Yes USA is good with Saudi but it is because Saudi is obeying USA, the resistance showed by Iran is more than enough but USA is not attacking on contrary it didn't took much time for USA to attack on sunni Iraqi government.

zoyaayoub · #**268** Saturday, July 12, 2014

@alina sorry i got late
can you people suggest any remedy to the giant disaster and massacre going on in Palestine? i mean what should be done by whom?
as we know OIC is not even interested in the issue seemingly.

LUTUF ALI · #**269** Saturday, July 12, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoyaayoub

@alina sorry i got late
can you people suggest any remedy to the giant disaster and massacre going on in Palestine? i mean what should be done by whom?
as we know OIC is not even interested in the issue seemingly.

Well according to me what should be done is a bit complicated but by whom is clear all that is all Muslim countries. USA is pro Isreal and un can't.

zoyaayoub · #**270** Saturday, July 12, 2014

apart from the discussion i need a suggestion from my thread fellows that is it a wise choice to opt urdu in place of sociology and punjabi??
as the paper set in 2014 for sociology gives me nightmares lol

and i haven't ever read anything in punjabi

p.s i know i must not start it amid the CA discussion but i need suggestions

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUTUF ALI

Well according to me what should be done is a bit complicated but by whom is clear all that is all Muslim countries. USA is pro Isreal and un can't.

when we know OIC headed by SA is least concerned with whats going on in ghaza then where to unite? as unfortunately we only know "kill shia and kill sunni" and the world knows "kill muslim''

The Following User Says Thank You to mhz99 For This Useful Post:
LUTUF ALI (Saturday, July 12, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to Aliinaa For This Useful Post:
LUTUF ALI (Saturday, July 12, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to mhz99 For This Useful Post:
Aliinaa (Saturday, July 12, 2014)

The Following User Says Thank You to zoyaayoub For This Useful Post:
LUTUF ALI (Saturday, July 12, 2014)