what to do?.......help please

[very special 1]

AOA

hope you all are fine and in good health

some days before i was solving past papers and when i reached 2011 paper i totally shocked to watch rutherfords question........and similarly the lenz law part in the question

as these both topics are not mention in the course outline

and paper method is totally conceptual.......

r we going to do masters in physics in this css exam?:

now seniors and qualifiers help me that in which way i will revise the syllabus?

waiting for reply
regards .

[azure]

Bohr atomic model is modification of Rutherford 's model.
They mentioned Bohr, but didn't mention Rutherford in the course outline, but it is obvious you would have to go through the Rutherford work before studying Bohr's theory.

[very special 1]

thanks for reply
i know that bohars theory is modification of rutherfords theory .........every topic is connected with 1 another ....every one is advancment of some previous

so my question is that.........

in what way to cover the syllabus so that we can attempt the paper easily.........

similarly lenzs law is aplication of faradays law........everything is connected.....

so what stratedgy we should adopt?

as we are not doing masters in physics .........just giving 200 marks paper

regards

[azure]

hahah true, after preparing for CSS physics, one can easily apply for honorary PHD degree in it.

Well, i have prepared 95 percent of the syllabus. And while going through the 5 years papers, i came to know, i would be able to attempt 5 questions easily, provided the numerical problems are not tough. So, i am not bothering much about these "apparently out of syllabus" topics.

[very special 1]

Originally Posted by azure

hahah true, after preparing for CSS physics, one can easily apply for honorary PHD degree in it.

Well, i have prepared 95 percent of the syllabus. And while going through the 5 years papers, i came to know, i would be able to attempt 5 questions easily, provided the numerical problems are not tough. So, i am not bothering much about these "apparently out of syllabus" topics.

honorary phd ..............i think ya kuch zayada ha.........ya but mphill ka lya ho sakta ha............hahahahhahah
dear please tell which topics of nuclear and atomic you have covered?
waiting
regards

[azure]

well, for nuclear and atomic physics, i have prepared 19,20,21 chapters of FSc 2. we had done it before in our FSc, plus the material is "to the point" and thus easier to handle. kuch topics jo nahe they, e.g zeeman effect, Schrodinger equ etc...that i covered from BSc physics.

I had started my preparation in the mid of December, so i have only concentrated on 5 years papers, for all subjects. Didn't go into details..jo topic nahe mila, that i have considered , "left in choice" :p

[Tehman Khan]

Originally Posted by azure

well, for nuclear and atomic physics, i have prepared 19,20,21 chapters of FSc 2. we had done it before in our FSc, plus the material is "to the point" and thus easier to handle. kuch topics jo nahe they, e.g zeeman effect, Schrodinger equ etc...that i covered from BSc physics.

I had started my preparation in the mid of December, so i have only concentrated on 5 years papers, for all subjects. Didn't go into details..jo topic nahe mila, that i have considered , "left in choice" :p

Brother how many marks you got in CSS please