|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Way to Solve Mercantile Law Problems
Dear All
I found this on internet and sharing with all here.This will help u in solving the ML problems & cases. How to Brief Cases and Analyze Problems How to Brief Cases: To fully understand the law with respect to business, you need to be able to read and understand court decisions. To make this task easier, you can use a method of case analysis that is called briefing. There is a fairly standard procedure that you can follow when you “brief ” any court case. You must first read the case opinion carefully. When you feel you understand the case, you can prepare a brief of it. Although the format of the brief may vary, typically it will present the essentials of the case under headings such as those listed below. 1. Citation. Give the full citation for the case, including the name of the case, the date it was decided, and the court that decided it. 2.Facts. Briefly indicate (a) the reasons for the lawsuit; (b) the identity and arguments of the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s), respectively; and (c) the lower court’s decision—if appropriate. 3.Issue. Concisely phrase, in the form of a question, the essential issue before the court. (If more than one issue is involved, you may have two—or even more— questions here.) 4.Decision. Indicate here—with a “yes” or “no,” if possible— the court’s answer to the question (or questions) in the Issue section above 5.Reason. Summarize as briefly as possible the reasons given by the court for its decision (or decisions) and the case or statutory law relied on by the court in arriving at its decision. Analyzing Case Problems: In addition to learning how to brief cases, students of business law and the legal environment also find it helpful to know how to analyze case problems. Part of the study of business law and the legal environment usually involves analyzing case problems. Provided will be the relevant background and facts of the lawsuit and the issue before the court. When you are assigned one of these problems, your job will be to determine how the court should decide the issue, and why. In other words, you will need to engage in legal analysis and reasoning. Here we offer some suggestions on how to make this task less daunting. We begin by presenting a sample problem(Just for understanding the concept, this is not a ML example as for as I think ): While Janet Lawson, a famous pianist, was shopping in Quality Market, she slipped and fell on a wet floor in one of the aisles. The floor had recently been mopped by one of the store’s employees, but there were no signs warning customers that the floor in that area was wet. As a result of the fall, Lawson injured her right arm and was unable to perform piano concerts for the next six months. Had she been able to perform the scheduled concerts, she would have earned approximately $60,000 over that period of time. Lawson sued Quality Market for this amount, plus another $10,000 in medical expenses. She claimed that the store’s failure to warn customers of the wet floor constituted negligence and therefore the market was liable for her injuries. Will the court agree with Lawson? Discuss. Understand the Facts: This may sound obvious, but before you can analyze or apply the relevant law to a specific set of facts, you must clearly understand those facts. In other words, you should read through the case problem carefully—more than once, if necessary—to make sure you understand the identity of the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) in the case and the progression of events that led to the lawsuit. In the sample case just given, the identity of the parties is fairly obvious. Janet Lawson is the one bringing the suit; therefore, she is the plaintiff. Quality Market, against whom she is bringing the suit, is the defendant. Some of the case problems you may work on have multiple plaintiffs or defendants. Often, it is helpful to use abbreviations for the parties. To indicate a reference to a plaintiff, for example, the pi symbol— —is often used, and a defendant is denoted by a delta— —a triangle. The events leading to the lawsuit are also fairly straightforward. Lawson slipped and fell on a wet floor, and she contends that Quality Market should be liable for her injuries because it was negligent in not posting a sign warning customers of the wet floor. When you are working on case problems, realize that the facts should be accepted as they are given. For example, in our sample problem, it should be accepted that the floor was wet and that there was no sign. In other words, avoid making conjectures, such as “Maybe the floor wasn’t too wet,” or “Maybe an employee was getting a sign to put up,” or “Maybe someone stole the sign.” Questioning the facts as they are presented only adds confusion to your analysis. Legal Analysis and Reasoning: Once you understand the facts given in the case problem, you can begin to analyze the case. The IRAC method is a helpful tool to use in the legal analysis and reasoning process. IRAC is an acronym for Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion. Applying this method to our sample problem would involve the following steps: 1.First, you need to decide what legal issue is involved in the case. In our sample case, the basic issue is whether Quality Market’s failure to warn customers of the wet floor constituted negligence. As discussed in Chapter 4, negligence is a tort—a civil wrong. In a tort lawsuit, the plaintiff seeks to be compensated for another’s wrongful act. A defendant will be deemed negligent if he or she breached a duty of care owed to the plaintiff and the breach of that duty caused the plaintiff to suffer harm. 2.Once you have identified the issue, the next step is to determine what rule of law applies to the issue. To make this determination, you will want to review carefully the text of the chapter in which the problem appears to find 2 1 the relevant rule of law. Our sample case involves the tort of negligence. The applicable rule of law is the tort law principle that business owners owe a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect their customers (“business invitees”). Reasonable care, in this context, includes either removing—or warning customers of—foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or should have known. Business owners need not warn customers of “open and obvious” risks, however. If a business owner breaches this duty of care (fails to exercise the appropriate degree of care toward customers), and the breach of duty causes a customer to be injured, the business owner will be liable to the customer for the customer’s injuries. 3.The next—and usually the most difficult—step in analyzing case problems is the application of the relevant rule of law to the specific facts of the case you are studying. In our sample problem, applying the tort law principle just discussed presents few difficulties. An employee of the store had mopped the floor in the aisle where Lawson slipped and fell, but no sign was present indicating that the floor was wet. That a customer might fall on a wet floor is clearly a foreseeable risk. Therefore, the failure to warn customers about the wet floor was a breach of the duty of care owed by the business owner to the store’s customers. 4.Once you have completed step 3 in the IRAC method, you should be ready to draw your conclusion. In our sample case, Quality Market is liable to Lawson for her injuries, because the market’s breach of its duty of care caused Lawson’s injuries. Regards, Asad |
The Following User Says Thank You to iamcalledasad For This Useful Post: | ||
Raz (Wednesday, April 15, 2009) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
thanks imcalledasad for ur valueable post
yar there is little confusion in above solved case . fine Quality Market is liable to Lawson for her injuries, because the market’s breach of its duty of care caused Lawson’s injuries. . but wat would be of special dammages claimmed by While Janet Lawson[$60,000] had she performmed her conserts . plz explain |
The Following User Says Thank You to cyrus For This Useful Post: | ||
Aeiman Siddiqi (Sunday, January 17, 2010) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present | Sumairs | Pakistan Affairs | 13 | Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM |
Basic human problems and role of wahi in their solutions | I M Possible | Islamiat | 11 | Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:40 PM |
5 Reasons Why God Uses Problems | Eve | Humorous, Inspirational and General Stuff | 0 | Monday, April 16, 2007 12:27 PM |