Friday, April 26, 2024
06:11 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group III > Public Administration
Discussion partner required! Discussion partner required!

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Smile Discussion partner required!
salam! Is there any active member who would like to discuss different aspects of public administration? As i have gone through the whole syllabus.It would be highly beneficial. believe me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Zilladar
  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 27
Thanks: 13
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
bekar is on a distinguished road
Default
yea i also opted PA& wanna discussion
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 210
Thanks: 163
Thanked 172 Times in 103 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default


me too opted pa waiting for start discussion
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Mohsin Sultan Sangha's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 953
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lahore & Chiniot
Posts: 193
Thanks: 87
Thanked 120 Times in 57 Posts
Mohsin Sultan Sangha will become famous soon enough
Default
Opt for pa only if you had it in masters or someone who is a authority in this subject is going to teach you.

i wasted a month on it and then didnt opt. too much technical and unrealistic.
__________________
Hard work conquers !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
usmanamjad87's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Karachi, Multan, Pakistan
Posts: 411
Thanks: 28
Thanked 255 Times in 200 Posts
usmanamjad87 will become famous soon enoughusmanamjad87 will become famous soon enough
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohsin Sultan Sangha View Post
Opt for pa only if you had it in masters or someone who is a authority in this subject is going to teach you.

i wasted a month on it and then didnt opt. too much technical and unrealistic.
Its not the case. One can opt it easily even if he dont hav background in PA. I had it and found it easy. May be you had faced trouble but it doesnt mean its bad or unrealistic.
__________________
I am not interested in power for power's sake, but I'm interested in power that is moral, that is right and that is good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Mohsin Sultan Sangha's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 953
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lahore & Chiniot
Posts: 193
Thanks: 87
Thanked 120 Times in 57 Posts
Mohsin Sultan Sangha will become famous soon enough
Default
Yeah of course others might find it interesting but still i would say that there are other easy options available for aspirants. Only people like u should opt it u find it interesting others should opt easy ones.
__________________
Hard work conquers !
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Default Discussion Required!
Strong Bureaucracy is administratively weak???

In my opinion it is primarily due to the defects of Bureaucracy-Red Tapism,Nepotism, Non-Responsiveness. More strong Bureaucracy would be the defects, it poses, would also be of the same extent.
So strong Bureaucracy is administratively weak because of it's shortcomings.

AM I RIGHT??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 210
Thanks: 163
Thanked 172 Times in 103 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default not agree
Bureaucracy is the predefined structure so i think it will have administrative structure as campare to other styles.......so i m disagree
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 134
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Default
Then why strong bureaucracy is administratively weak?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 210
Thanks: 163
Thanked 172 Times in 103 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default
this is what i m saying that bureaucracy is not weak in admin ......because it has prdefined structure of powere in which u can easily define the admin structure example of this army ....do u think army is administrativly weak ......i dont think so
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tips on Group Discussion jadoon khan Banking Jobs 3 Wednesday, June 09, 2010 07:16 PM

CSS Forum - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.