CSS Forums Saturday, May 18, 2013
09:28 PM (GMT +5)
 
 
Home   Beginner's Guide   Rules   Syllabus   Past Papers   CSP Members  
Home Beginner's Guide Rules Syllabus Past Papers CSP Members

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group A > Public Administration
Discussion partner required! Discussion partner required!
Home Register Awards Members List Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply Share this thread on: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us     Submit Thread to Google Google     Submit Thread to Digg Digg     Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon    
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Smile Discussion partner required!
salam! Is there any active member who would like to discuss different aspects of public administration? As i have gone through the whole syllabus.It would be highly beneficial. believe me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Zilladar
  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 33
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
bekar is on a distinguished road
Default
yea i also opted PA& wanna discussion
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 260
Thanks: 173
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default


me too opted pa waiting for start discussion
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Mohsin Sultan Sangha's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 953
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lahore & Chiniot
Posts: 200
Thanks: 89
Thanked 121 Times in 57 Posts
Mohsin Sultan Sangha will become famous soon enough
Default
Opt for pa only if you had it in masters or someone who is a authority in this subject is going to teach you.

i wasted a month on it and then didnt opt. too much technical and unrealistic.
__________________
Hard work conquers !
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
usmanamjad87's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Multan, Pakistan
Posts: 480
Thanks: 27
Thanked 256 Times in 208 Posts
usmanamjad87 will become famous soon enoughusmanamjad87 will become famous soon enough
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohsin Sultan Sangha View Post
Opt for pa only if you had it in masters or someone who is a authority in this subject is going to teach you.

i wasted a month on it and then didnt opt. too much technical and unrealistic.
Its not the case. One can opt it easily even if he dont hav background in PA. I had it and found it easy. May be you had faced trouble but it doesnt mean its bad or unrealistic.
__________________
I am not interested in power for power's sake, but I'm interested in power that is moral, that is right and that is good.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Mohsin Sultan Sangha's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 953
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lahore & Chiniot
Posts: 200
Thanks: 89
Thanked 121 Times in 57 Posts
Mohsin Sultan Sangha will become famous soon enough
Default
Yeah of course others might find it interesting but still i would say that there are other easy options available for aspirants. Only people like u should opt it u find it interesting others should opt easy ones.
__________________
Hard work conquers !
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Default Discussion Required!
Strong Bureaucracy is administratively weak???

In my opinion it is primarily due to the defects of Bureaucracy-Red Tapism,Nepotism, Non-Responsiveness. More strong Bureaucracy would be the defects, it poses, would also be of the same extent.
So strong Bureaucracy is administratively weak because of it's shortcomings.

AM I RIGHT??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 260
Thanks: 173
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default not agree
Bureaucracy is the predefined structure so i think it will have administrative structure as campare to other styles.......so i m disagree
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 104
Thanks: 24
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
farhan1111 is on a distinguished road
Default
Then why strong bureaucracy is administratively weak?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Muhammad iqbal Serwar's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DHA,
Posts: 260
Thanks: 173
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
Muhammad iqbal Serwar will become famous soon enough
Default
this is what i m saying that bureaucracy is not weak in admin ......because it has prdefined structure of powere in which u can easily define the admin structure example of this army ....do u think army is administrativly weak ......i dont think so
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PCS study partner in Hyderabad required Sammar Ellahi SPSC 1 Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:26 AM
Tips on Group Discussion jadoon khan Banking & Finance 5 Wednesday, June 09, 2010 07:16 PM

CSS Forum - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: This is not the official website of Federal Public Service Commission Pakistan. This is a non-commercial website helping individuals who intend to join civil service of Pakistan. The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only. We do not claim that the site is an exhaustive compilation of information about Civil Service of Pakistan neither represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any information, content contained on, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any page of this website. These materials are intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete or up to date. However, honest efforts have been made to provide comprehensive information for the benefit of users. The documents and material displayed or mentioned on this site are not official copies. Please contact FPSC for updated rules and regulations governing CSS examination.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.