CSS Forums - English precis and composition paper 2016

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)

- CSS 2016 Papers (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2017/css-2016-papers/)

- - English precis and composition paper 2016 (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-papers/css-papers-1971-2017/css-2016-papers/107681-english-precis-composition-paper-2016-a.html)

whats the mistake i committed in essay

Please don't scare her! Something that has gone wrong for one candidate doesn't actually go the same way for others. No two persons can have same marks for somewhat similar outlines. similarly the fate of two essays can't be all the same. It wasnt a good idea to point out a mistake in her outline this way I believe. Now Madiha will be in a state of worry for all these 6 months.

Madiha! keep praying and have faith. Try to improve all this time for your next attempt while praying for this one. Good luck :)

[B][U]Synonyms:[/U][/B]
1. Nabob
2. Pall
3. Sacrosanct
4. Louche
5. Stentorian
6. Loquacious
7. Chimera
8. Temerity
9. Propinquity
10. Vociferous

[B][U]Antonyms:[/U][/B]
1. Germane
2. Fatuous
3. Sapient
4. Mutational
5. Impecunious
6. Irascible
7. Approbate
8. Supercilious
9. Quiescent
10. Sartorial

Synonyms:
1. Nabob : [B]Bigiwig [/B]
2. Pall : [B]Satiate [/B]
3. Sacrosanct: [B]Sacred [/B]
4. Louche: [B]Indecent[/B]
5. Stentorian: [B]Loud [/B]
6. Loquacious: [B]talkative [/B]
7. Chimera: [B]Illusion [/B]
8. Temerity: [B]Stupid [/B]
9. Propinquity: [B]nearness[/B]
10. Vociferous: [B]Strident [/B]

Antonyms:
1. Germane: [B]irrelevant[/B]
2. Fatuous: [B]sensible[/B]
3. Sapient:
4. Mutational
5. Impecunious
6. Irascible : [B]placid[/B]
7. Approbate : [B]condemn[/B]
8. Supercilious: [B]meek[/B]
9. Quiescent: [B]active[/B]
10. Sartorial: [B]cheerful[/B]

Hats off to FPSC for setting such a horrific paper that is around 35% out of the syllabus. Thanks to Lord at least this time my synonyms and antonyms went better and I am hoping to sail this horrific paper.

My 13+ vocabs are correct. 3 Analogies, 4 corrections, 4 idioms, 5 Pairs of words, 2 punctuation, Narrative passage was fine but not really good, translations and précis done really well but in the last I was short of time so could not manage to solve all the comprehension well. However, I am hoping for the best. Wishing you all the best of luck :)

[QUOTE=exclusively;913832]Synonyms:
1. Nabob : [B]Bigiwig [/B]
2. Pall : [B]Satiate [/B]
3. Sacrosanct: [B]Sacred [/B]
4. Louche: [B]Indecent[/B]
5. Stentorian: [B]Loud [/B]
6. Loquacious: [B]talkative [/B]
7. Chimera: [B]Illusion [/B]
8. Temerity: [B]Stupid [/B]
9. Propinquity: [B]nearness[/B]
10. Vociferous: [B]Strident [/B]

Antonyms:
1. Germane: [B]irrelevant[/B]
2. Fatuous: [B]sensible[/B]
3. Sapient:
4. Mutational
5. Impecunious
6. Irascible : [B]placid[/B]
7. Approbate : [B]condemn[/B]
8. Supercilious: [B]meek[/B]
9. Quiescent: [B]active[/B]
10. Sartorial: [B]cheerful[/B]

Hats off to FPSC for setting such a horrific paper that is around 35% out of the syllabus. Thanks to Lord at least this time my synonyms and antonyms went better and I am hoping to sail this horrific paper.

My 13+ vocabs are correct. 3 Analogies, 4 corrections, 4 idioms, 5 Pairs of words, 2 punctuation, Narrative passage was fine but not really good, translations and précis done really well but in the last I was short of time so could not manage to solve all the comprehension well. However, I am hoping for the best. Wishing you all the best of luck :)[/QUOTE]
Temerity: Audacious
Mutational: Parental

[QUOTE=ursula;913842]Your good title of precise???
I also got 15+ correct(I really enjoyed this portion)
Mutation:antonym parent
And sapient,meaning scholar ,my answer to this mcq was also correct,but I didn't remember the option.
Rest,it was halwa except analogies,because I didn't make it in my practice.
I have just one query!
is there any deduction on cross cutting.(since in the paper I had done precise three times and cut two with lead pencil,should I hope that examiner will have tenderness towards my paper's insolubrious impression)[/QUOTE]

Good yar, It is all about the so-called slaughtering trend of FPSC. They always hit one paper to fail the candidates. No, it does not matter, because crossing would be considered rough work.. It looks FPSC will slaughter essay paper again. The scoring trend of composion paper would likely be carried out as they used to be in CE-2015. They have made blunders in setting composition paper. Analogy, Idioms & narrations are not in the list of syllabus. So how can they ask for such questions? Does it make sense! Moreover, synonyms and antonyms were 20 in number, whereas, in accordance with syllabus they needed to be 10. It is evident that they will give leniency in composition paper. One the other hand, essay papers seems to be easier, yet it is technical one. Therefore, they will slaughter essay paper again. :)

Stupidity of mine slaughtering trend is beyond my comprehension.You mean paper checkers [B]deliberately[/B] fail students.

[QUOTE=ursula;913860]Stupidity of mine slaughtering trend is beyond my comprehension.You mean paper checkers [B]deliberately[/B] fail students.[/QUOTE]

passing essay is not a difficult task, but fulfilling all the requirements of essay writing is a hill task. So whenever fpsc has to target the essay paper the criteria for essay checking tightened. Resultantly only those pass it who possess a good command. I.e command over comprehension, relevant writing, adequate vocabulary, good grammar, completeness in essay, proper organization, following four forms of discourse, coherence and lolz

Let me tell you one thing more: comprehending the css essay paper is a hill task. Majority for example would have mixed up gender with sex in gender equality essay. Likewise foreign aid would have been taken either as donation or debt only.