Monday, April 29, 2024
06:58 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2012
alihashmatkhoso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Karachi, now Lahore .
Posts: 773
Thanks: 431
Thanked 854 Times in 468 Posts
alihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura aboutalihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura aboutalihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura about
Unhappy Why Pakistani Taliban matter,,, from dawn ..

By Muhammad Amir Rana | 7/1/2012 1200 AM

UNLIKE the Afghan Taliban, the international community doesnotappearkeen to engage the Pakistani Taliban in talks.

The emphasis in western and regional capitals is on reconciliation with the Afghan Taliban and that obviously forms part of the Nato exit strategy from Afghanistan.

Although there is little reason so far to be optimistic about the future of engaging with the Afghan Taliban, at least weighing the different options is under way. One may be excused for concluding that the western and regional capitals consider the burden of sorting out the Pakistani Taliban to be Islamabad`s alone.

The security, strategic, political and ideological implications of the post-Nato scenario in the region and the future ofthe Pakistani Taliban is not getting the deserved attention in Islamabad`s policy circles. No rationale for this attitude is available, except for the ambiguous threat perception about the Pakistani Taliban,especially amid false notions of their reconcilability and the externalisation of the threat.

In that context, there is a need to identify the potential of the Pakistani Taliban and their strength, which may help remove any ambiguities in threat perception. The Pakistani Taliban`s main strength lies in their ideological bond with Al Qaeda and their connection with the Islamisation discourse in Pakistan.

They gain political and moral legitimacy by associating themselves with the Afghan Taliban. Their tribal and ethnic ties provide social space and acceptance among a segment of society.

At their core, the Pakistani Taliban espouse Deobandi sectarian teachings.

This commonality allows them to function under a single umbrella, even though their political interpretation of Deobandi principles is at times not monolithic. As a group, they maintain a dogmatic stance by espousing an interpretation that is intolerant of all other Muslim sects.

This ought to isolate the Taliban from the majority of Pakistanis who adhere to the Barelvi tradition. In reality, this was only partially the case when the insurgency began as the Pakistani Taliban craftily created a narrative around their movement that found sympathy acrossthe sectarian divide. They strove to portray their struggle as one aiming at driving out foreign `occupation` forces from Afghanistan in the short run, and all `infidel` forces from Muslim lands in the long run.

By doing so, they not only tied in with transnational jihadi groups in a material sense but also presented themselves as ideologically similar. More tangibly, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) leadership, especially its first head Baitullah Mehsud, also tried to portray the outfit as an operation under Mullah Omar`s Afghan Taliban. Every militant faction that wished to join the TTP had to take an oath of commitment to the enforcement of the Sharia and of allegiance to Mullah Omar. By doing so, Baitullah hoped to gain more legitimacy and further portray his struggle as Afghanistanfocused.

Baitullah knew that existing as an overt anti-Pakistan group aiming to target the Pakistani state would quicklygenerate a consensus against his activities, and therefore he used the TTP`s ideological, ethnic and sociopolitical ties with the Afghan Taliban to stress a natural cohesion between their operations and goals. This strategy was also instrumental in attracting other sectarian groups, such as the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi (LJ), and splinter groups of Kashmir-oriented outfits to work closely with the TTP.

The Pakistani Taliban not only had a well-defined ideological base, the geostrategic milieu also worked in their favour. While the Pakistani Taliban may not enjoy moral or political support from neighbouring states, they have strong connections with non-state actors in those territories, which allow them to thrive despite opposition from the Pakistani state.

The TTP has connections with smugglers and mafias in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and have support from international terrorist networks, including Al Qaeda. Coupled with the Pakistani state`s belief that the conflict in Afghanistan is upsetting the regional power balance in favour of its adversaries, and that the war is entertaining covert wars of international and regional spy agencies and players, it has distracted the counterinsurgency focus.Another strategic advantage for the Taliban has been its dynamic leadership; evident especially in the case of killed leaders such as Nek Muhammad, Abdullah Mehsud, Baitullah Mehsud, as well as the current TTP head Hakeemullah Mehsud, who emerged as a `charismatic strategist`. Hakeemullah also quickly realised the benefit in assoclating himself with global terrorism rings, and used it as a means to enhance his own and his outfit`s stature.

Hakeemullah`s appearance in 2009 in a video with a Jordanian suicide bomber, who later killed several CIA agents in the Afghan province of Khost, put his name on the list of high-value militant targets for the US. This endorsed his stature as a worthy successor to Baitullah. Similarly, TTP`s fingerprints on the failed Time Square bombing by Pakistani-born Faisal Shehzad in May 2010 elevated the TTP`s stature as a group that could directly threaten America on its own soil.

The challenge for the Pakistani state iscomplex, with dire implications for the country`s internal security. Al Qaeda, the TTP and militant groups in Punjab, Karachi and elsewhere have developed a nexus. Splinter groups of banned militants organisations oremerging groups have been involved in the recent wave of terror in mainland Pakistan.

These groups, tagged as the `Punjabi Taliban`, are the product of a narrative of destruction fostered within the country over the past three decades. Their agendas revolve around Islamisation and sectarianism. Their operational capabilities have been enhanced by Al Qaeda providing them training and logistics, and by the Pakistani Taliban offering safe sanctuaries.

Breaking these links between Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and mainland militant groups is not an easy task, especially when the state continues to lack the vision to build a comprehensive counterterrorism strategy, and the capacity for effective implementation.

Even if all of these things materialise, the central, and the most difficult, task for the state in the post-Taliban insurgency scenario will be to overhaul and rehabilitate tribal society, as well as restructure the administrative, political and economic systems in the areas where the Taliban claim to provide an alternative to the state. • The writer is editor of the quarterly research journal Conflict and Peace Studies.

mamirrana@yahoo.com
__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none......
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2012
peacepakistan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Punjab
Posts: 182
Thanks: 41
Thanked 45 Times in 36 Posts
peacepakistan will become famous soon enough
Default

1. In his column, he is clearly stating that TTP and other Jihadists try to gain legitimacy by linking them to Mullah Omer and brand them as "true descendants of Afghan Taliban" but no such association and media statement came from Taliban in support of TTP's claim.
2. Why would pakistani Taliban be called for Talks? they are planted ones by America and are very successfully completing their missions by targeting pakistani forces and common people, portraying Pakistan as a chaotic and failed state which further proves that Nato and USA presence and support and Drone intervention is inevitable. Moreover proving pakistan as a Terrorist state that they are not taking action against Taliban...

3.Yes, Pakistan is supporting real Taliban like haqqani group who are only involved in Real jihad and freedom fighting against foreign intervention but only in Afghanistan...Not a single attack in pakistan...and they are hiding in South East Afghan-paki region. why Americans are not themselves taking ground actions because US elections are on the way and a dozen US casualities is enough for Obama to leave president house...So now Pakistan is the only scapegoat..;-(
4. its a grave issue that will happen after NAto eviction. because the rouge Taliban will still be active on American Dollars...For that empowerment to native tribal heads and community is best solution...with the help of civil servants instead of Army...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Material required on Taliban and Talibanisation Mehria Off Topic Lounge 1 Tuesday, September 21, 2010 03:03 PM
Letter From Kabul Khanabadosh News & Articles 0 Monday, December 21, 2009 10:50 PM
The Afghan-Pakistan militant nexus : By BBC bugti786 News & Articles 0 Friday, July 03, 2009 09:39 PM
Next-Gen Taliban Predator News & Articles 0 Thursday, January 17, 2008 01:30 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.