Quote:
Originally Posted by sadia hussain
war on terrorism is possibly going to be a "strategic defeat" and could not be camouflaged with positive words.some strong voices from within and outside America are asking "is it worth the cost?".The very name "war on terror" implies its nature and the possibility of a never ending war. have it been a "war against Afghanistan" or "war against Taliban" America today could have blown the triumph. but now is the time when Obama administration has rightly judged that they can not win a war against terrorism. as terrorism is not confined to a certain group, country, region, or religion.
America now seems to be moving away from view of fighting on world's behalf. french intervention in Mali shows that burden is shifting to those who have immediate interests/threats.
|
afghan land always remain the grave yard of powers.winning crowns visit afghanistan to taste defeat.and after ussr now americans were digging miracle here now they are rushing back without any fruit
a plea they can take is only "" ABBOTABAD OPERATION"" .beside this taliban were governing the afghanistan and peaceful activities had been the proud of afghani taliban.they were no threat for Pakistan, South Asia and for world..americans are bleeting wolves and they are themselves actors ,planners and players of the whole terror game ..now collecting the ash of defeat in a great proud way