Europe's future, tangled by its past

[venom]

Europe's future, tangled by its past

PARIS -- Europe's latest step toward a more united future, which seemed at hand after long delays, has become bogged down over a forgotten chapter from the continent's bloody past: the expulsion of Germans from Czechoslovakia after World War II.

The unexpected hitch has provided a vivid reminder that the nations that gave birth to the European Union are only one generation away from the World War II and Cold War horrors during which the lives of millions were sacrificed to ideology or nationalism.
The man most responsible for tripping the memory switch on those stormy days is the president of what is now the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus, who is known as a Czech nationalist skeptical of giving the European Union supranational powers.
Although the Czech Parliament has voted favorably, Klaus has refused to sign off on ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, a two-year-old pact that would grant greater powers to the E.U. leadership in Brussels and create a European president for the first time.
Before he signs, Klaus said, he wants a special provision added to the Lisbon Treaty's Charter of Fundamental Rights. The last-minute add-on, officials said, would exempt the Czech Republic from paying reparations or returning land to the estimated 2.5 million ethnic Germans who were expelled from the Sudeten areas under the 1945 Benes decrees, named after the Czech president at the time.

The expulsions were among a number of ethnic cleansings carried out in Central Europe after World War II to undo -- and take revenge for -- what happened when the regions were occupied or annexed by Hitler's Third Reich. Although largely relegated to history books, the issue still has the power to arouse concern in the Czech Republic's western border areas where most of the expulsions took place.
"This may strike a chord in the Sudetenland, where this issue is very sensitive for all the obvious reasons," said Oldrich Cerny, who was national security adviser under President Vaclav Havel and now heads the Prague Security Studies Institute.

Slovakia also objects

Most legal specialists maintain that, even without a special opt-out, the Charter of Fundamental Rights would not endanger the status of Sudeten property owners after all these years, Cerny said. The expelled Germans have not mounted legal challenges, and German officials have said their government is not interested in pursuing claims.
But Klaus has seized on the issue as a "last-ditch" instrument to further delay his signature on the ratification document, which he actually opposes, Cerny added.
Tomas Valasek, director of the foreign policy and defense section of the Center for European Reform in London, said Klaus probably realizes he cannot hold out much longer and is insisting on the treaty change as a way to save face when he finally relents. "Basically, this is a way for him to sign on to the Lisbon Treaty and claim victory at the same time," Valasek said.
In that vein, Klaus told an interviewer last week that, once Sudeten landowners are protected, he probably will sign the treaty despite his reservations. "The train is going so fast and it has gone so far that I think it is impossible to stop it, whatever our desire might be," he said.
But further complicating the situation, Prime Minister Robert Fico of Slovakia said Sunday that he, too, wants an opt-out to protect Slovakia from any problems over the expulsion of ethnic Germans. Slovakia, which was part of the single country of Czechoslovakia at the time, was also covered by the Benes decrees, although a much smaller number of Germans were expelled from its territory.
In part, Fico may be motivated by the prospect of elections next year, positioning himself as a defender of national interests to boost his popularity, Valasek said. But the move also reflects genuine concern that if the problem is serious enough for the Czech Republic to worry about, then Slovakia should make sure the interests of landowners in its border areas are protected as well, he added.

European leaders vexed

The Lisbon Treaty, a watered-down version of earlier unification attempts, was long delayed because of hesitations over sovereignty in several nations. But those have since been overcome, largely by scaling back the pact's ambitions. Since Ireland approved the treaty in a referendum this month, the Czech Republic has been the lone holdout for ratification among the 27 nations that make up the E.U.
Klaus's stand has irritated European leaders, who thought after the Irish vote that they were at last on their way -- and were already angling to see who would be the E.U.'s first president and which countries would get how many slots in an enhanced European diplomatic service.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, a strong unification advocate, called Klaus's refusal to sign "unacceptable" and warned that there would be "consequences" for the Czech Republic if he continued to hold out.
Slovakia's demand also annoyed European officials, particularly because it had fully ratified the treaty. Foreign Minister Carl Bildt of Sweden, which holds the E.U.'s rotating presidency, resorted to irony at Fico's announcement. "I was under the impression that Slovakia was finished with its ratification process," he cracked.
E.U. officials said, however, that Bildt's Foreign Ministry was negotiating with the Czech Republic over Klaus's demand and would be able to expand the talks to cover Slovakia as well. The hope, they said, is for the treaty to be ratified by all E.U. governments and take effect by early next year.
Slovakia and the Czech Republic are not the first countries to demand opt-outs. After a first vote in which the treaty was rejected, Ireland negotiated provisions to guarantee respect for its traditional neutrality and a law against abortions, opening the way for approval in this month's vote.Similarly, Britain and Poland insisted during negotiations on exceptions guaranteeing that nothing in the Charter of Fundamental Rights would add to the rights enjoyed by citizens under their own constitutions. Denmark insisted on an opt-out from any E.U. defense obligations.
"The difference with the Czech Republic and Slovakia is that now we are going back to it after two years," complained an E.U. official who requested anonymity to speak frankly about the delays.
(Wahsington post)