Wednesday, May 29, 2024
02:06 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > Foreign Newspapers

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, September 13, 2013
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lahore
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Muzaffar Hussain Muzi is on a distinguished road
Default Articles


Satellite images suggest North Korea restarted small nuclear reactor, U.S. institute says

(Source:washingtonpost.com ,September 12)

Recent satellite imagery suggests that North Korea has restarted a small nuclear reactor, allowing the secretive nation to potentially bolster its stockpile of plutonium for weapons, a U.S. research institute said Thursday.

The North had said five months ago that it would restart key operations at its Yongbyon nuclear facility “without delay.” The report from the U.S.-Korea Institute at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies indicates that it is quietly going ahead with that pledge — and facing few apparent problems in firing up a reactor mothballed for six years. Commercial satellite images from Aug. 31 show two plumes of white steam rising from a turbine building adjacent to the reactor. That steam is an essential byproduct of the reactor’s operation, and its venting suggests the “electrical generating system is about to come online,” the report said.

The North’s graphite-moderated reactor is ill suited for power production, nuclear experts who have visited the site say, because it has meager capacity and is poorly connected to the electricity grid. But the reactor can be used to produce weapons-grade plutonium — about 13 pounds per year, enough for one or two bombs.

The North said in April that it sought a restart both to offset its “acute shortage of electricity” and to boost its “nuclear armed force both in quality and quantity.”

North Korea rarely allows foreign inspectors access to the Yongbyon site, and there was no immediate way to confirm the reactor’s operation.

The apparent restart, which comes in a period of rapprochement with the South, could raise international pressure to negotiate another freeze of Pyongyang’s nuclear program. But U.S. officials say they are wary of further disarmament talks, noting a pattern in which the North makes promises in return for aid and fuel, then breaks those promises.

United States administrations have struggled over two decades to end North Korea’s nuclear program, using a combination of sanctions and diplomacy. The U.S. has tried to crack down on North Korean financial institutions and companies that serve the country’s weapons program. But the U.S. has also given the North more than $1 billion in aid.

That behavior “makes it very hard to imagine how the six-party [talks] could be fruitful at the moment,” Glyn Davies, the State Department’s envoy for North Korea policy, said in Seoul on Monday. Davies was referring to the multi-nation process for negotiating the North’s denuclearization.

The North has been trying for more than three decades to accumulate fissile material, but the five-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon is the most visible symbol of that program. First started up in 1986, it was frozen twice in diplomatic agreements, most recently in 2007. Experts estimate that North Korea has enough plutonium for four to eight bombs roughly the size of those the United States dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, in World War II.

The North also has a uranium-enrichment program about which much less is known, as most production facilities are covered or underground — away from satellite detection.

In 2010, the top nuclear engineer at Yongbyon told Siegfried Hecker, a former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, that the five-megawatt reactor was in “standby mode” and capable of restarting with just a few months of maintenance work.

Once that reactor restarts, it begins producing plutonium almost immediately
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan Affairs MCQs Khan Faisal Pakistan Affairs 8 Thursday, January 03, 2019 05:19 PM
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN Constitutional Law 0 Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM
Articles related to geography B SYEDA SABAHAT Geography 0 Saturday, October 29, 2011 05:05 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.