I got minimum 60% marks in each section. My age is 33 year 10 month. Secondly I check 8peoples in shortlisting list who got 71 marks.

[QUOTE=SALEEMAZIZ;1041345]I got minimum 60% marks in each section. My age is 33 year 10 month. Secondly I check 8peoples in shortlisting list who got 71 marks.[/QUOTE]
Would you like to share the marks of each section as I did?

[QUOTE=Mixed Smile;1041340]Dear All,

I have confirmed news that EOBI itself shortlisted the final list of candidates. After declaring provisional results, NTS sent all the results along with marks sheet to EOBI head office, where all the biased Final results prepared.

This is also confirmed that first lists of short listing of candidates was not the same as they declared. The lists tempered after visit of very high official of Government to EOBI Head office. :vangry

There are so many proof of biased results. You people will be amazed to know that In Investment Cadre they shortlisted people those don't even fulfill their MANDATORY/COMPULSORY criteria of education and the people those shortlisted already knew their results well before the declaration of provisional results even. And they are shortlisting 10 candidates against one post of "DEPUTY DIRECTOR -FIXED INCOME" for Punjab domicile instead of 5. But Still i have faith in Almighty Allah.

Moreover, the pay scales for officer cadre is still under consideration for revision, but not revised yet due to immense pressure from UNION side. So the pays for each post will remain the same till resolution of UNION VS MANAGEMENT issues. :sleeping

I request all the candidates those have grievances, should sent a complaint to Chairman EOBI in email and through Courier as well. To make it immensely important for them, so they can spare time to re-check the shortlisting.[/QUOTE]
When I was crying about such irregularities and corruption since the announcement of final result, some members were simply rejecting my claim. Where is Mr. Khalid Iqbal Khattak (seems EOBI employee) now who was delivering a lengthy lecture on the transparency of EOBI. This is what our major and minor institutions doing in disguise of fresh recruitment.

Alhamdullilah shortlisted for Assistant and got 74 marks in Gb/Fata qouta. Some have concerned about result and they are blaming for the poor system or recommendation tradition. Well its not everywhere i got these marks with my hard work and strong belief on Allah. If u work hard and belief on Allah u get reward. It is pertinent to mention that i have also cleared interview in Ministry of Defence and hope for the success in next process. Further that each qouta has different marks so dont blame NTS EOBI by qouting examples other qouta candidates. Still there is merit system in our country if v work hard we would get reward. Best Wishes to All. [QUOTE][/QUOTE]

Brother check the number of seats according to your qouta and number of shortlisted candidates. If posts are 2, they will shortlist top 10 candidates. I think u were below the merit.

[QUOTE=Mixed Smile;1041340]Dear All,

I have confirmed news that EOBI itself shortlisted the final list of candidates. After declaring provisional results, NTS sent all the results along with marks sheet to EOBI head office, where all the biased Final results prepared.

This is also confirmed that first lists of short listing of candidates was not the same as they declared. The lists tempered after visit of very high official of Government to EOBI Head office. :vangry

There are so many proof of biased results. You people will be amazed to know that In Investment Cadre they shortlisted people those don't even fulfill their MANDATORY/COMPULSORY criteria of education and the people those shortlisted already knew their results well before the declaration of provisional results even. And they are shortlisting 10 candidates against one post of "DEPUTY DIRECTOR -FIXED INCOME" for Punjab domicile instead of 5. But Still i have faith in Almighty Allah.

Moreover, the pay scales for officer cadre is still under consideration for revision, but not revised yet due to immense pressure from UNION side. So the pays for each post will remain the same till resolution of UNION VS MANAGEMENT issues. :sleeping

I request all the candidates those have grievances, should sent a complaint to Chairman EOBI in email and through Courier as well. To make it immensely important for them, so they can spare time to re-check the shortlisting.[/QUOTE]
No doubt that eobi is always controversial in the past too..Allah reham kre sub per

[QUOTE=akbarisb7;1041374]Alhamdullilah shortlisted for Assistant and got 74 marks in Gb/Fata qouta. Some have concerned about result and they are blaming for the poor system or recommendation tradition. Well its not everywhere i got these marks with my hard work and strong belief on Allah. If u work hard and belief on Allah u get reward. It is pertinent to mention that i have also cleared interview in Ministry of Defence and hope for the success in next process. Further that each qouta has different marks so dont blame NTS EOBI by qouting examples other qouta candidates. Still there is merit system in our country if v work hard we would get reward. Best Wishes to All.[/QUOTE]
Oh bhai sahib kis dunya me reh rahe ho aap k 74 aagaye aur aap shortlist hogaye hain to matlab k system theek chal raha hai koi sifarish ka culture nahi hai? Mere 70 hain yahan bohut se 71 wale bhi hain mai aur wo list me shamil nahi hain aur 63 64 waale 4 4 banday select hogaye hain ye konsa system hai apne hi bnaye howe passing marks criteria k against lists bnaayi hain.

@Mubashar Khattak
Hope it is just a clerical error which should definitely be corrected when you go for legal options.
May you get justice. Aameen!

NTS has removed the list of shortlisted candidates from Website. May be they are correcting their mistake now.

[QUOTE=Mubashar Khattak;1040862]Now this is utter crap from NTS. They are gone against their own section-wise marking criteria. I applied for Assistant post which falls under staff category and for that very category, NTS has clearly mentioned that 40% in each section and 50% in aggregate is compulsory in order to qualify the test. Here is my result;
English = 11/15--->73.3%
Maths = 9/15---->60%
Computer = 18/20-->90%

IQ = 2/5-->40% (in which NTS has considered me fail despite the fact that qualifying criteria for staff category in each section is 40%)

GK = 5/5---->100%
Subject = 25/40---->62.5%

Now, it is obvious that I have to pay price for the incompetency of the NTS's stenotypist.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mubashar Khattak;1040950]Talked with NTS female representative right now and she was clueless and tried to get away by saying that "Sir, aap k IQ section me 5 me se 2 marks aaye hain aap khud batayen k ye 40% kaise bnte hain?". I was astonished to know that she was ignorant of such a simple equation. I explained her the formula to get the percentage then she paused for a while and said ok sir, agar aap samajhte hain k aapke hr section me 40% wala criteria poora horaha hai to ek application likhen aur uske saath result ka screenshot laga kr hume fax kren. Now their fax number is not operating.[/QUOTE]

Mubashir khattak, may be you have passed the test but there are candidates who's aggregate score is higher. like i have passed a test with aggregate 71 and meeting other criteria of 50% in each section but m not short listed for interview bcuz other got higher in aggregated n passed each section with 50% also. im shortlisted for other position where my aggregate is 67 , im short listed bcuz the there are only two people who got higher aggregate marks.
in short. u r low on aggregate in comparison to others though u have passed the test.